Inertia and Kinetic energy of the sun

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the inertia and kinetic energy of the sun, highlighting that the initial formulas used were incorrect. The correct moment of inertia for the sun is approximately 0.059*M*R^2, rather than the initially suggested 0.4*M*R^2. The formula for kinetic energy should be K = (1/2)Iω^2, where I is the moment of inertia, and the previous calculations were significantly off. It is emphasized that the simplified model of the sun does not accurately represent its density variations, which affects these calculations. Ultimately, the user acknowledges a note-taking error in their initial value for inertia.
Torrenza
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ive been trying to find the Inertia and Kinetic energy of the sun. I have a feeling I am using the wrong formulas to obtain the answer.

Mass of sun 2*10^30kg
Radius of sun 700*10^6 m
t spin = 26 days

the answers should be
I = 4.0 * 10^98
K energy = 1.5 * 10^16

Homework Equations



I=(2/5)*M*R^2
K= (1/2)M*(ω^2)*(r^2)
ω = 2pi/t

The Attempt at a Solution

If someone knows how to do this i would really appreciate it.:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation for the moment of inertia of a solid sphere is correct. The answer you gave is not correct. (by a factor of more than 10^50)

Another problem is that the core of the sun is so much more dense than the upper layers.
According to this http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html"

the moment of inertia is about 0.059*M*R^2 instead of 0.4*M*R^2


The equaton for kinetic energy is K = \frac {1}{2}I {\omega}^2

where I is the moment of inertia. The answer given is wrong. All of the answers
require units.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
willem2 said:
The equation for the moment of inertia of a solid sphere is correct. The answer you gave is not correct. (by a factor of more than 10^50)

Another problem is that the core of the sun is so much more dense than the upper layers.
According to this http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html"

the moment of inertia is about 0.059*M*R^2 instead of 0.4*M*R^2


The equaton for kinetic energy is K = \frac {1}{2}I {\omega}^2

where I is the moment of inertia. The answer given is wrong. All of the answers
require units.

The real problem here isn't the overly-simplified model of the sun, but the wrong formula given for spin kinetic energy.

Spin kinetic energy is the kinetic energy associated with an object's rotation about its own center of mass.

The formula for it is: K_{spin}=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 where I is the relevant moment of inertia (Depending on what axis the object is spinning about).

The formula you cited is only true for a point object, and for thin rings, where, as a private case of the general formula, I=mr^2, which does not hold in general.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for answering the question, I now see what i did wrong. The I = 4.0 * 10^98 was a note taking error, lol just a slight difference from the real answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top