B Inertia of a rolling dumbell

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia of a dumbbell, consisting of two plates of equal mass on a rod, is not affected by changing the distance "R" of the plates from the center, provided the mass of the bar remains constant. This holds true when the dumbbell rolls in a straight line. However, if the rotation occurs about an axis that is not parallel to the rod, the moment of inertia would be influenced by the distance of the weights. Therefore, the configuration of the weights matters only under specific rotational conditions. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate calculations in physics.
yunica
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How does the distance by which two plates are placed from a dumbell's center affect inertia
Hi guys,
I was just wondering this question: say I have a dumbell which is two plates of equal mass placed on a rod, then is the moment of inertia for this object affected when the distance the plates are placed from the center "R" changes?

I've attached an image to illustrate me point
1748650947950.webp


Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
yunica said:
... is the moment of inertia for this object affected when the distance the plates are placed from the center "R" changes?
No.
If the mass of the bar is constant, and it rolls in a straight line, then the separation of the weights will not determine the inertia.
 
Unless it is rotating about an axis that is not parallel to the rod
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Moment of inertia and contact force
Replies
7
Views
2K
I How find moment of inertia for car in turn?
Replies
49
Views
5K
B Rotating Capacitor: Concentrating energy using accessible technology
Replies
5
Views
1K
B When is the parallel axis theorem not appliable?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I I'm calculating more energy out than I put in
3
Replies
138
Views
7K
A Forces on rotating disk object
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Stiffened panel - moments of inertia
Replies
4
Views
2K
Moment of inertia of a composite object in Solidworks
Replies
10
Views
2K
Moment of Inertia of something that rotates
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Rolling Without Slipping
2
Replies
59
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top