B Inertia of a rolling dumbell

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia of a dumbbell, consisting of two plates of equal mass on a rod, is not affected by changing the distance "R" of the plates from the center, provided the mass of the bar remains constant. This holds true when the dumbbell rolls in a straight line. However, if the rotation occurs about an axis that is not parallel to the rod, the moment of inertia would be influenced by the distance of the weights. Therefore, the configuration of the weights matters only under specific rotational conditions. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate calculations in physics.
yunica
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How does the distance by which two plates are placed from a dumbell's center affect inertia
Hi guys,
I was just wondering this question: say I have a dumbell which is two plates of equal mass placed on a rod, then is the moment of inertia for this object affected when the distance the plates are placed from the center "R" changes?

I've attached an image to illustrate me point
1748650947950.webp


Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
yunica said:
... is the moment of inertia for this object affected when the distance the plates are placed from the center "R" changes?
No.
If the mass of the bar is constant, and it rolls in a straight line, then the separation of the weights will not determine the inertia.
 
Unless it is rotating about an axis that is not parallel to the rod
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
138
Views
7K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
3K
Back
Top