Infinite Acceleration, Conservation of Energy, and Negative Mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of negative mass in relation to the Alcubierre Drive and its potential violation of the conservation of energy. Participants explore Newton's gravitational law, specifically how negative mass would interact with positive mass, leading to perpetual motion scenarios. The conversation highlights that while negative mass may suggest infinite acceleration, it ultimately results in constant acceleration away from each other, challenging the notion of perpetual motion. The consensus is that the behavior of negative mass is complex and often misunderstood, necessitating further exploration of its implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's gravitational law
  • Familiarity with concepts of mass and energy conservation
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and acceleration
  • Awareness of theoretical physics concepts, particularly negative mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Alcubierre Drive and its dependence on negative mass
  • Study the implications of negative mass on energy conservation laws
  • Examine kinematics in the context of negative mass interactions
  • Explore reputable sources on theoretical physics and negative mass phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced concepts of mass, energy conservation, and the implications of negative mass in physics.

Raze
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've read that the Alcubierre Drive depends on the existence of negative mass, but I've seen that physicists say it could violate the conservation of energy. Their reasoning is that basically a negative mass and positive mass would interact in a perpetual motion sort of way that eternally decreases entropy, that they'd accelerate infinitely.

I was wondering if someone here could help do a kinematics demonstration of that and why such perpetual motion would come of it and why it violates conservation of energy.

I guess I'll start my own attempt to understand with Newton's gravitational law. Suppose these two particles (one with negative mass) are close enough that if they were normal they'd attract.

F = -Gm1m2/r2

except m2 < 0, so I'll add a negative sign.

Then F = Gm1m2/r2

which should mean they repel away from each other, right? If that negative sign were still there, we could have

a = -F/m1 = -Gm2/r2,​

which would mean they would accelerate at a constant rate until they hit each other, right? If the negative is removed, that means they'd accelerate at a constant rate away from each other, right? Then how is this infinite acceleration? It seems it's just a constant acceleration away from each other.
Or is it that merely adding a negative sign isn't enough to describe how negative mass would behave? If it were more like negative mass always repels negative mass, and positive mass always attracts positive mass, then would mixing the two would result in a repulsive AND attractive force? If so I can see why that could be a conundrum.

But if the masses were of different magnitude, wouldn't either the repulsive or attractive force win out, resulting in more or less "normal" energy situations? And if the masses were of equal magnitude, wouldn't the repulsion and attraction exactly cancel in this scenario? (resulting in a net of zero kinetic energy)
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K