Infinite brightness in the singularity?

DavidGahan
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Since the black hole has infinite brightness near the singularity just below the photon sphere, would the big bang singularity also possesses such characteristic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DavidGahan said:
Since the black hole has infinite brightness near the singularity just below the photon sphere
What do you mean infinite brightness?
 
Passionflower said:
What do you mean infinite brightness?

According to this site: http://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/schw.html

"The Universe appears brighter and brighter as you approach the horizon, tending to infinite brightness at the horizon."
 
Note that this applies only for the static observer - i.e. the original quote is:

Click on the image at left (with the horizon grid) or right (without the horizon grid) for an animation of the appearance of the outside Universe as you lower yourself slowly to the horizon. The Universe appears brighter and brighter as you approach the horizon, tending to infinite brightness at the horizon. But again, no one with any sense would do this.

An observer free-falling through the black hole, or even an observer accelerating away from the black hole with a finite acceleration while falling through the event horizon, would not see the same infinite brightness. So it's a bit of a mistake to think of the infinite brightness as a property of the black hole.

Also note that an observer with infinite acceleration in a flat space-time would see the universe in a similar way. More precisely, an observer accelerating in a flat space-time (say with a rocketship) would also see the universe appear visually to abberate, approaching in the limit of infinite acceleration a single point of infinite brightness in front of the rocket ship.

So it's better to think of the infinite brightness as being due to the observer's acceleration than it is to think of it as being due to the black hole.

See for instance http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/singularity.html

(another website from colorado.edu)

Answer to the quiz question 5: False. You do NOT see all the future history of the world played out. Once inside the horizon, you are doomed to hit the singularity in a finite time, and you witness only a finite (in practice rather short) time pass in the outside Universe.

In order to watch the history of the Universe unfold, you would have to remain outside the horizon, the Schwarzschild surface. One way to watch all the history of the Universe would be to stay just above the horizon, firing your rockets like crazy just to stay put. The Universe would then appear not only speeded up, but also highly blueshifted (probably roasting you in gamma rays), and concentrated in a tiny piece of the sky just above you.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
547
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top