Infinite Series: A Beginner's Guide

AI Thread Summary
Infinite series can be challenging for beginners, but they represent the sum of an infinite sequence of numbers. A key example is the series 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ..., which converges to 2, illustrating how an infinite series can have a finite sum. This series can be understood as taking progressively smaller steps, where each term is half of the previous one, never exceeding a total distance of 2 units. The formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is S∞ = a / (1 - r), where 'a' is the first term and 'r' is the common ratio, provided that r is less than 1. Understanding these concepts allows for practical application in solving homework problems related to infinite series.
vigintitres
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I am getting into this topic and I am having a hard time conceptualizing it. Is there anybody that can spend a minute letting me know the "reality" to infinite series? By that I mean, please explain infinite series in such a way that a beginner like me will be able to take what you said and apply it to home work problems. Thanks and if I am asking too much I understand because this is a deep topic
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know what you mean by reality. However a simple example is:

1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +1/16 + etc. where you never stop. As a result it adds up to 2.
 
mathman said:
I don't know what you mean by reality. However a simple example is:

1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +1/16 + etc. where you never stop. As a result it adds up to 2.

You can think of this as taking half a step as you did last step. Your first step is of 1 unit, so next step is 1/2, next one 1/4 and so on. The question is how much distance can you travel using this method and that is 2. You cannot exceed 2 units of distance by using this mode of transportation.
 
<br /> T_n = ar^{n-1}<br />

<br /> r &lt; 1<br />

<br /> S_n = \frac{a(1-r^n)}{1-r}<br />

<br /> n \rightarrow \infty<br />

<br /> r^n \rightarrow 0<br />

<br /> S_\infty = \frac{a}{1-r}<br />
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top