- #1
rohit dutta
- 19
- 0
Given,
U(n)=1/(logn)^(2*n)
To find:
Whether the series ƩU(n) is convergent or divergent.
Sequence of tests to be followed:
*Comparison tests
*Integral tests
*D'Alembert's ratio test
*Raabe's test
*Logarithmic test
*Cauchy's root test
My approach:
Comparison test:
Since the series V(n) cannot be obtained from the given series, comparison test[which says Lt U(n)/V(n) as n→∞= some finite number (≠0)] fails. So, we must proceed.
Integral test:
Since, U(n) is a decreasing function of n, this test holds. One can perform the integral to find out whether the series is convergent or divergent. Say this integral is time taking. So, I decide to skip this test.
Ratio test:
U(n)/U(n+1)= [{log(n+1)}^2*(n+1)]/[{log(n)}^2*n]. I skip this too due to it's complexity.
Now, what I do is that I skip the intermediate tests and directly come to Cauchy's test.
Cauchy's root test:
[U(n)]^(1/n)= 1/[log(n)] (On solving)
Lt [U(n)]^(1/n) as n→∞= Lt 1/[log(n)] as n→∞= 0(<1). So, according to the test, the series converges.
Now, I initially said that the integral test holds but I decided to skip the test saying it was tough to integrate. Then, I moved on to the ratio test and came up with a complicated expression and once again, I decided to skip the test. I skipped the intermediate steps too and finally I felt that Cauchy's test was user-friendly and used it to get my answer.
My doubt is, can I perform any test that succeeds the previous one such that former test holds? What I mean to say is can I perform a test (say any test) which comes after the integral test to simplify the problem? The integral test did hold but it was tough whereas the Cauchy's test provided a simple approach. Will my approach always assure the right answer?
To be even more clear, will the result obtained by the integral test match the result obtained by Cauchy's test?
Also, do I need to follow the exact sequence of tests mentioned above? I believe that for a particular series more than one tests can hold so I always go in a random sequence depending on my analysis of the series. The textbook goes in this sequence so I wanted to clarify.
U(n)=1/(logn)^(2*n)
To find:
Whether the series ƩU(n) is convergent or divergent.
Sequence of tests to be followed:
*Comparison tests
*Integral tests
*D'Alembert's ratio test
*Raabe's test
*Logarithmic test
*Cauchy's root test
My approach:
Comparison test:
Since the series V(n) cannot be obtained from the given series, comparison test[which says Lt U(n)/V(n) as n→∞= some finite number (≠0)] fails. So, we must proceed.
Integral test:
Since, U(n) is a decreasing function of n, this test holds. One can perform the integral to find out whether the series is convergent or divergent. Say this integral is time taking. So, I decide to skip this test.
Ratio test:
U(n)/U(n+1)= [{log(n+1)}^2*(n+1)]/[{log(n)}^2*n]. I skip this too due to it's complexity.
Now, what I do is that I skip the intermediate tests and directly come to Cauchy's test.
Cauchy's root test:
[U(n)]^(1/n)= 1/[log(n)] (On solving)
Lt [U(n)]^(1/n) as n→∞= Lt 1/[log(n)] as n→∞= 0(<1). So, according to the test, the series converges.
Now, I initially said that the integral test holds but I decided to skip the test saying it was tough to integrate. Then, I moved on to the ratio test and came up with a complicated expression and once again, I decided to skip the test. I skipped the intermediate steps too and finally I felt that Cauchy's test was user-friendly and used it to get my answer.
My doubt is, can I perform any test that succeeds the previous one such that former test holds? What I mean to say is can I perform a test (say any test) which comes after the integral test to simplify the problem? The integral test did hold but it was tough whereas the Cauchy's test provided a simple approach. Will my approach always assure the right answer?
To be even more clear, will the result obtained by the integral test match the result obtained by Cauchy's test?
Also, do I need to follow the exact sequence of tests mentioned above? I believe that for a particular series more than one tests can hold so I always go in a random sequence depending on my analysis of the series. The textbook goes in this sequence so I wanted to clarify.
Last edited: