I Information for black hole region in surface surrounding it

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the black hole information paradox, specifically the idea that information about particles within a black hole may be preserved on its surface. While it is proposed that the surface encodes the total number of bits, questions arise about whether it retains detailed information about the particles' states, such as their positions and momenta. The analogy of a spreadsheet is used to illustrate the concern that knowing the total number of bits does not provide insight into their arrangement or specific details. Participants express the need for authoritative references to clarify these complex concepts, as the topic remains an area of active research. Understanding how surface fluctuations might encode transient information is also highlighted as a point of interest.
arlesterc
Messages
43
Reaction score
3
At one point I read there was the concern that a black hole could lose bits of information. Then a theory arose that showed that all the bits in a black hole were to be found on the surface of the black hole. Thus if there were let's say 1000 particles in a black hole each of which could be described by 3 states, the surface of the black hole would have all the bits that this counted up to so that information bits could never be lost. What is not clear to me is how is it that the surface has anything other than the total number of bits of information - it has no detail on them. It seems to me that if I had a spreadsheet for the 1000 particles in the black hole and all their states at an instant in time and it occupied x number of cells - each cell being a bit - that the surface might tell me I had x bits but I don't see how that would tell me very much about how they bits were arranged. So if I had information about each particle in the black hole, it's position and momentum - 3 bits - the surface would tell me I had 3000 bits of information in the black hole but not anything about what those were - what particles, what positions, what momenta. It seems to me that something has been lost in translation. If anybody can clear this up, where I might be on the wrong track it would be appreciated.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I imagine black hole surface fluctuations have transient information encoded about its contents similar to how ocean surface waves contain information about a submarine traveling beneath it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. However I would like more detail/less analogy. The question is straightforward - might be completely nonsensical to someone in the field or not answerable currently - I will take either. So in summary 3000 bits of information in black hole - surface confirms the total number of bits. Does it say anything else about those bits other than agreeing with total number? If so how does it say or it how do we make it say it?

Hopefully someone will be able to assist in my understanding of this.
 
I'm not a scientist, but I spend a fair amount of time/effort trying to learn how this stuff works heuristically, so unfortunately analogies is all I have, hopefully someone else will chime in with more authoritative info.
arlesterc said:
So in summary 3000 bits of information in black hole - surface confirms the total number of bits.
I don't believe this is how black hole information works; my understanding (to use another analogy) is it's like listening to a record play through instead of looking at the music on paper.
 
Last edited:
arlesterc said:
At one point I read there was the concern that a black hole could lose bits of information.

Please give a specific reference. This is a complex topic (in fact I'm not sure it can be usefully discussed even at the "I" level; it really is an "A" level topic), and is still an open area of research, so to have a good basis for discussion at all, we need to start with a valid reference.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top