Information transfer that is faster than c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puma24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
Puma24
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If I were to have some material, that was rigid, and was also say, 300,000,000 metres long. If I were to poke it at one end, would another observer see an instantaneous response at the other end? Ie, would the information I put into one end of the material travel faster than the speed of light to the other end?

I guess it woudln't be so easy. I assume that poking it counts as a sort of pressure wave that would have to be transferred through all the electrostatic processes along the way, which would be limited by c? Then I guess, can you argue that there is such thing as an incompressible material? (at least in regards to the force of my jabbing finger)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Puma24 said:
I guess it woudln't be so easy. I assume that poking it counts as a sort of pressure wave that would have to be transferred through all the electrostatic processes along the way, which would be limited by c? Then I guess, can you argue that there is such thing as an incompressible material? (at least in regards to the force of my jabbing finger)

Correct, the electromagnetic processes have to carry the information the whole way, and no, by your previous thought process, you can't have an incompressible material.
 
Alright then. So if we had the power to observe the material, would we see the side I poke move slightly, and then a sort of compression wave propogate through the material (like you could imagine a sound wave compressing air), warping the dimensions as it goes? Do you know if the speed of this wave has a speed that is constant, or is a consequence of the materials properties, like density I guess?
 
Puma24 said:
and then a sort of compression wave propogate through the material (like you could imagine a sound wave compressing air),
I believe it literally is a sound wave.
 
Hurkyl said:
I believe it literally is a sound wave.
Yes. And the speed at which the wave propogates is the speed of sound in that material.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top