Infrared Emitter and Detector Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter latinerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detector Infrared
AI Thread Summary
A regular cadmium-sulfide (CdS) detector may not effectively detect infrared light in complete darkness, and alternatives like PIN photodiodes are recommended for better performance in beam break sensors. For building the infrared emitter circuit, using a 9V battery with a calculated 50 Ohm resistor is appropriate, although using three C cells could enhance battery life. The response time of CdS detectors is slower compared to other options, which may affect their effectiveness in certain applications. It's important to compare the emitter and detector specifications to ensure compatibility. Overall, selecting the right detector and optimizing the power source will improve the circuit's performance.
latinerd
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi nerdy geeky folks,

I have two questions:

1. can a regular cadmium-sulfide detect infrared in a complete absence of light (but a beam of infrared)? if not, what can be used to detect infrared (for a beam break sensor)?

2. I just want to make sure that I am building the circuit right. So, I am building an infrared emitter whose forward voltage is 1.3-1.7V, reverse voltage is 5V, and continuous forward current is 150mA (according to he specification provided by Radioshack). I am using a 9-V battery as a power source. Since 9V-1.3V=7.7V and 7.7V/150mA=51 Ohm, I should use a 50 Ohm resistor, right?

This will help me tremendously, and I appreciate it!

HJ
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The resistor value sounds right. You'd get much better battery life by using 3 C cells and making a 150mA current source with transistors, but you can do it with the 9V battery and dropping resistor.

As for the detector, I haven't used CdS detectors, but you should be able to compare the datasheet spectra for the emitter and the candidate CdS detector to see how they match up. I've used PIN photodiodes for detectors, and they match up well with the IR spectrum. I'm usually concerned with the speed of the photodector response, so that's why I use reverse-biased PIN photodetectors (in a current-to-voltage opamp circuit configuration).
 
I'm fairly sure, without looking it up, that CdS detectors have a very broad range of frequencies it can see well. So will have to have it dark of other light to get a good change in resistance. And like Bekerman implied, CdS detector response times are kinda slow.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top