Initial acceleration of the charge

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Three identical charged balls of mass m and charge q bound in a triangle thread length l. One of the strands break. Calculate the acceleration of the middle ball at the initial moment.

2. Relevant equation

a. Newton's laws

##m\vec a_1 = \vec F_{12} +\vec F_{13} + \vec T_{13}##
##m\vec a_2 = \vec F_{21} +\vec F_{23} + \vec T_{23}##
##m\vec a_3 = \vec F_{31} +\vec F_{32} + \vec T_{31} + \vec T_{32}##b. Constraint Equations

##(\vec r_1 -\vec r_2)^2 = (\vec r_1 -\vec r_3)^2 = const##

c. May be relations between ##\vec r##-vectors in CM-system
##\vec r_1 +\vec r_2+\vec r_3=0 ##

12-02.gif

The Attempt at a Solution


The unknown T-forces should to be exluded using Constraint Equations, but what to do with it, I have no idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haruspex said:
How could you obtain another equation concerning accelerations from you constraint equations (b)?
I believe your equation (c) should be deducible from the other equations.
Yes (c) is the cosequence of the Newton's laws.
I don't know answers. Now I have no idea, how to start to solve this problem.
 
From the (b), I can obtain
First differentiating:
##(\vec r_1 - \vec r_3)(\vec v_1 - \vec v_3)=0##
From the second differentiating:
##(\vec v_1-\vec v_3)^2 + (\vec r_1 - \vec r_3)(\vec a_1 - \vec a_3)=0##

And for the second constraint
##(\vec v_2-\vec v_3)^2 + (\vec r_2- \vec r_3)(\vec a_2 - \vec a_3)=0##
 
Last edited:
sergiokapone said:
From the (b), I can obtain
First differentiating:
##(\vec r_1 - \vec r_2)(\vec v_1 - \vec v_2)=0##
From the second differentiating:
##(\vec v_1-\vec v_2)^2 + (\vec r_1 - \vec r_2)(\vec a_1 - \vec a_2)=0##
Right. But we are only interested in the initial acceleration. What simplification does that provide?
 
For the initial conditions:
##\vec v_1= \vec v_2 = \vec v_3=0##.
Then
##(\vec r_1 - \vec r_3)(\vec a_1 - \vec a_3)=0##

And
##(\vec r_2 - \vec r_3)(\vec a_2 - \vec a_3)=0##
 
Last edited: