Initial condition for Schrödinger equation

kengrimwood
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
(If the equation below do not appear correctly, you can read all of the question in the attached file.)

Solving the time dependent 1D Schrödinger equation, one can show that in all points (x,t),

i\bar{h}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi(x,t)=-\frac{\bar{h}^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\Psi(x,t)+V(x)\Psi(x,t)=E\Psi(x,t)

for a certain value of the energy E. This means that the wave function is necessarily an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian operator.

On the other hand, we may specify an initial condition for this problem. My question is: what if the initial condition DOES NOT verify the above equations. Namely, if -\frac{\bar{h}^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\Psi(x,t)+V(x)\Psi(x,t) is not proportional to \Psi(x,t).

Does it mean that not all initial conditions will give a solution or am I wrong somewhere? Thank you for your help!
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your assertion that all possible wavefunctions are eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian is wrong. You mixed the stationary and the non-stationary Schroedinger equations. The stationary one is an eigenvector equation and gives you a basis of the solution space together with the eigenfrequencies. Any solution to the time dependent S.E. can be decomposed into that eigenbasis and each component then evolves with stationary magnitude and given angular frequency for the phase.

Cheers,

Jazz
 
kengrimwood said:
(If the equation below do not appear correctly

The equations did not display correctly originally because you had a blank space inside each [tex ] and [/tex ] tag, as shown here. I removed those spaces for you. (It's rather difficult to show those tags as ordinary text because the forum software insists on interpreting them as actual tags and then hiding them!)

For more information about using LaTeX here, see:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3977517#post3977517
 
kengrimwood said:
My question is: what if the initial condition DOES NOT verify the above equations. Namely, if -\frac{\bar{h}^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\Psi(x,t)+V(x)\Psi(x,t) is not proportional to .

Does it mean that not all initial conditions will give a solution or am I wrong somewhere? Thank you for your help!

There can be many solutions to the T.I.S.E(including non-normalizable), but normally only those are of any interest which are proportional to \Psi(x,t)(eigenfunction), since only these solutions give you the E(eigenvalue) as constant, which in turn are stationary states with definite energy when we apply the initial conditions.
 
Plainly speaking, if I am getting your problem right, if you cannot solve for the initial wave function, then you cannot determine its solution after time 't'. Its because the time dependent solution is because we consider that after finding the initial solution, we can find the wave evolved over time through the initial one. Its too hard to right the mathematics from mobile, so i just conveyed my opinion on words.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top