Initial Velocity of a dropped object problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of initial velocity for objects in motion. When an object is dropped, its initial velocity is considered 0 m/s at the moment it leaves the hand, as it has not yet begun to move downwards. Conversely, when an object is thrown upwards at 25 m/s, that speed is its initial velocity immediately after leaving the hand. The confusion arises from measuring velocity while the object is still in hand versus after it begins motion. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly applying the concept of initial velocity in physics problems.
sinchan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why we take initial velocity of dropped object downwards as 0 and 25m/s when the object is thrown 25m/s upwards ?

What is then initial velocity cause when t=0 both object dropping and moving upwards had 0 velocity - in other words when object came to motion at both places it had some velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sinchan said:
Why we take initial velocity of dropped object downwards as 0 and 25m/s when the object is thrown 25m/s upwards ?

What is then initial velocity cause when t=0 both object dropping and moving upwards had 0 velocity - in other words when object came to motion at both places it had some velocity?
Are you saying that, when you throw a ball, its velocity is zero when it leaves your hand? And, when you drop a ball, its velocity isn't zero when it leaves your hand?
 
Chestermiller said:
Are you saying that, when you throw a ball, its velocity is zero when it leaves your hand? And, when you drop a ball, its velocity isn't zero when it leaves your hand?

I can state better when I understand initial velocity - for me when object is dropped from height or thrown with a velocity upwards both of them has velocity zero when it is in hand but both of them have a velocity when it leaves the hand - but then I am not sure when do we measure initial velocity - when it is in hand or when it just started its moion - so when it is in hand for both case initial velocity is 0 and when it started its motion both of them have a velocity - so why we say that initial velocity of object dropped is 0 while 25 m/s when object is thrown upwards as in my example
 
sinchan said:
I can state better when I understand initial velocity - for me when object is dropped from height or thrown with a velocity upwards both of them has velocity zero when it is in hand but both of them have a velocity when it leaves the hand - but then I am not sure when do we measure initial velocity - when it is in hand or when it just started its moion - so when it is in hand for both case initial velocity is 0 and when it started its motion both of them have a velocity
This is not correct. When you throw something, the velocity of the object just before it leaves your hand is the same as its velocity just after it leaves your hand (>0). And when you drop something, its velocity just before it leaves your hand is the same as its velocity just after it leaves your hand (=0).
 
i understand your confusion...When you drop a ball, its velocity increases by every second.It becomes 9.8 m/s 1 second after leaving your hand.However, when you throw a ball, the only reason the ball goes out from your hand is because your provided it with acceleration, which caused it to have a velocity, which started its motion, hence its "initial" velocity. When you dropped the ball, the velocity at which the "downwards" motion of ball started is 0 m/s...
Hope this helps
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top