Initial wave function for an electron in a magnetic field

Syrius
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I am currently struggling with a problem that I came across while spending some free time on non-relativistic quantum mechanic problems.

Suppose we have an electron that is describe at time t_0 = 0 by a wave function in position space \psi(x,y,z). Furthermore, assume that we have a Hamiltonian
\hat{H}_1 = \frac{1}{2m}\left [ \mathbf{p}+\frac{e}{c} \mathbf{A}_1(\mathbf{r}) \right ]^2
with charge e, mass m and speed of light c. Then we can construct another Hamiltonian
\hat{H}_2 = \frac{1}{2m} \left [\mathbf{p}+\frac{e}{c} \mathbf{A}_2(\mathbf{r}) \right ]^2
that can be obtained from \hat{H}_1 via a gauge transformation of the vector potential
\mathbf{A}_2(\mathbf{r}) = \mathbf{A}_1(\mathbf{r}) + ∇ f(\mathbf{r})
with a scalar function f.

The question is now which of these two Hamiltonians do I use to evolve my initial wave function in time? I mean, if I fix the initial wave function and the Hamiltonian it is like fixing a gauge for the initial wave function.

In other words, are there some conditions that the initial wave function has to fulfill that depend on the chosen gauge?

Greetings, Syrius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe the form of wavefunctions will depend on the gauge, probably just an addition of phase factor in wavefunction. But all the physical measurements should be independent of gauge.
 
If we change A by a gauge transformation then
A'=A+∇λ(x),then the wave function will change accordingly as ψ'=ψe[ie/h-c∫∇'λ(x').ds']=ψe(ieλ(x)/h-c)
 
Hello Adrien and ck00,

thank you for your answers. I do know the transformation law that Adrien mentioned. However, my question is a little bit different and I will illustrate it with an example.

Let \hat{p}_{\text{mech}} = \hat{p} - \frac{q}{c} \mathbf{A}, where \hat{p} is the usual momentum operator and \mathbf{A} the vector potential. This operator is gauge covariant, i.e. it has the same form for every gauge.

Let us now assume that we are in a field free region and we choose our vector potential \mathbf{A} = 0. As an initial wave function I will take the eigenfunction |p> to the operator \hat{p}.

If we now change the gauge to \mathbf{A} = (1,0,0) and transform |p> with |p>' = e^{ieλ(x)/\hbar c} |p>, then we get that |p>' is indeed an eigenfunction to \hat{p}_{\text{mech}} = \hat{p} - \frac{q}{c} (1,0,0). So everything is correct here.

But now I can do everything in the backward way. I start with \mathbf{A} = (1,0,0) and the initial wave function |p> that is an eigenfunction to \hat{p} but it is not an eigenfunction to \hat{p}_{\text{mech}} = \hat{p} - \frac{q}{c} (1,0,0). That means, depending on the gauge, |p> can represent two different wave functions when one chooses it as the initial wave function. So my question is rather, how can I be sure that I choose the right initial wave function with the desired properties, when this properties may depend on the gauge.

Greetings, Syrius
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top