Inquiry about kinetic force in STR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter psyhprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Kinetic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the relativistic formula for kinetic force in the context of Special Theory of Relativity (STR). Participants explore various aspects of kinetic energy, momentum, and the application of Lorentz transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the term 'kinetic force' and relates it to the energy equation, providing a formula for kinetic energy derived from total energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that the ordinary force, or 3-force, is defined as the derivative of momentum with respect to time, suggesting familiarity with derivatives is assumed.
  • A participant expresses interest in understanding how to derive the relativistic kinetic energy from classical kinetic energy and whether Lorentz transformations provide insights into mass, velocity, and acceleration.
  • One contribution discusses deriving relativistic kinetic energy using the work-energy theorem, emphasizing the need for relativistic momentum.
  • Another participant references Einstein's original paper for derivation and suggests that a modern textbook may provide clearer insights into the energy-momentum 4-vector and the transformation of differential equations.
  • There is mention of Newton's laws as a basis for deriving relativistic expressions, indicating a connection between classical and relativistic physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and derivation of kinetic force and energy, with no consensus reached on the terminology or the best approach to understanding these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their mathematical background, which may affect their understanding of the derivations discussed. There is also a recognition that familiarity with calculus and differential equations is important for following the derivations in Einstein's work.

psyhprog
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have recently bought Einstein's book on the General and Special theory of Relativity and I have finished reading the first half (STR). I understood the ideas and concepts being discussed, as well as the Lorentz transformation, but I have only on question, how did he obtain the relativistic formula for kinetic force (\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean by 'kinetic force'. From the energy equation
E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4​
the kinetic energy is
mc^2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}-1\right)​
whereas the total energy, E, is
\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}​
 
Assuming you mean the ordinary force, sometimes called the 3-force ( to distinguish it form the relativistic 4-force), it's just

F = dp/dt

where p is the relativistic momentum. I'm assuming you're familiar with the concept of a derivative, if not - well, I'm not sure if the explanation can be made any simper, but it'd be good to know.
 
This is the chapter of the book that I got that from http://www.bartleby.com/173/15.html.

I am familiar with the concept of derivatives, but I'm just learning calculus and can only do some basic ones.

What I was wondering was what is the expression of kinetic energy (of a mass m) from STR, how did they get from the original formula for kinetic energy to this one, and can the Lorentz transformation tell us anything about mass, velocity, acceleration?
 
You can actually go from that formula to the original one. You know that \mathbf{P} = m\mathbf{U} = m\frac{\mathrm{d} \mathbf{x}}{\mathrm{d} \tau } and if you lorentz boost to some moving frame, then P^{0} = E = m(1 - v^{2})^{-1/2} \approx m + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2} to first order in v.
 
Last edited:
You can derive the relativistic kinetic energy from the work-energy theorem. It starts out just like in classical mechanics, but you have to use relativistic momentum instead of classical momentum. See this post:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=458653&postcount=2

(m is the rest mass and \gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2})
 
You can find Einstein's derivation in his original paper:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
(an online source). But you may need more than a passing familiarity with calculus to follow it - it's not super hard, but you'd need to be comfortable with transforming the differential equations of motion from one frame to another using the Lorentz
transforms.

Basically Einstein takes the POV that we know Newton's laws work at zero velocity, and uses that to find the relativistic expression that works at all velocities.

Also, if your goal is to understand special relativity better, you'd be better off with a more modern textbook (such as Taylor & Wheeler's space-time physics), dealing with the more modern idea of the energy- momentum 4-vector, rather than reading Einstein's original approach involving the so-called transverse and longitudinal masses, which arise from transforming the differential equations as above.

As others have noted, once you've gotten the expression for relativistic momentum (by whatever means), you can find the relativistic energy by work = force * distance.

force = dp/dt, the rate of change of momentum with time

Equivalently, power = dE/dt = force * dx/dt = force * velocity
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K