Inrush current in a transformer chain

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inrush current behavior in a transformer chain, specifically regarding XFMR1 and XFMR2 with open secondaries. It highlights that the inrush current may be influenced by factors such as leakage inductance, load circuitry, transformer core saturation, and winding capacitance. The consensus is that a more detailed model is necessary to accurately predict inrush current, as it can vary based on the initial magnetic state of the core. If the core is demagnetized when de-energized, no inrush current is expected in the secondary circuit. Overall, the complexity of the system makes precise predictions challenging.
Guineafowl
Messages
865
Reaction score
404
TL;DR Summary
How does connecting two transformers in a chain affect the inrush current (at switch-on), as opposed to one transformer on its own?
1707921595020.png


This is the proposal, except the two middle voltages are 110V, not 12V.

Say the max switch-on inrush current of XFMR1 is xA with the secondary open, would the value change significantly in the above arrangement, with the secondary of XFMR2 open?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have twice the leakage inductance, so the inrush may be a little lower.
 
berkeman said:
You have twice the leakage inductance, so the inrush may be a little lower.
Thanks.
 
Hard to answer without knowing what causes the inrush current.

- If it's from the load circuitry, the I'm with @berkeman, more series impedance buffer means less inrush magnitude, but longer duration (probably).

- If it's from the transformer core saturation because of residual magnetization, then it's just not predictable, at least to me. But, the same or maybe more.

- If it's from winding capacitance then you get an addition of some sort. Complicated by turns ratio and leakage inductance.

The short answer is that you need a much more detailed model, which is pretty difficult. As you drew it, I'd say there's no inrush surge in any case.
 
Last edited:
If the magnetic core was in demagnetized position when it was de-energized

then up to 100 A/m magnetic field the flux density is about 0 so E1=0 and E2=0 and I2=0 since the second loop E=0.

So, no inrush current is expected in the secondary.

0=U-(E+Z*Iinrush)

U is the supply voltage, E it is the electromotive force in the primary or secondary windings and Z is the short-circuit impedance.

E=Φ*ω Φ=Bfe*A [A= magnetic core cross section area].The current will rise in time from 0 to Iinrush .

If the magnetic core was in demagnetized position when it was de-energized then up to 100 A/m magnetic field the flux density is about 0 then Φ=0 so E1=0 and so E2. So, no inrush current is expected in the secondary.

Iinrush=(U-E)/Z [ if E1=0 then Iinrush=U/Z] ; Z=R+jXe Xe=leakage magnetic flux reactance Xe=Le*ω it is considered independent of main flux level.
 

Attachments

  • Magnetic flux density vs Field.jpg
    Magnetic flux density vs Field.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 65
  • Hard and soft magnet magnetic flux density.jpg
    Hard and soft magnet magnetic flux density.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 61
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top