Inside glass, can I apply relativity of speed for light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of special relativity to the speed of light traveling through glass. The speed of light in glass is expressed as c/n, where n is the refractive index. The original approach incorrectly applied velocity addition, leading to confusion about the time taken for light to traverse the glass. The correct interpretation is that the time is simply D/(c/n), reflecting that the speed of light in any medium is not the invariant speed c. The participants clarify that while c is the maximum speed in vacuum, c/n is just a subluminal speed in the context of relativity.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I was doing a exercise which considerst he time it takes for light travels a glass with thickness proper D and velocity v. The speed of light is c/n inside the glass.

Now, my approach was to go to the glass frame, take the relative speed between the glass and the light using the trivial formula for addition of velocity in SR, so i would got ##r##. The time it would take is ##D/r## and the distance ##D##. SO i would apply Lorentz transformations to go back to the ground frame.

But the answer was simply ##D/(c/n)##. Now we can understand what does this answer apply: speed of light is the same in all frame.

But, i though that the right way to interpret special relativity was that the maximum and "unique(in all frame)" speed is c, coincidentally this is the speed of light in vacuum.
And not that maximum and "unique(in all frame)" speed is the speed of light, which in vacuum is c.

I think you can see the difference and how this implies different answer to the question.

So, my interpretation is wrong? Or both are equivalent? what am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: .

I was doing a exercise which considerst he time it takes for light travels a glass with thickness proper D and velocity v. The speed of light is c/n inside the glass.

Now, my approach was to go to the glass frame, take the relative speed between the glass and the light using the trivial formula for addition of velocity in SR, so i would got ##r##. The time it would take is ##D/r## and the distance ##D##. SO i would apply Lorentz transformations to go back to the ground frame.

But the answer was simply ##D/(c/n)##. Now we can understand what does this answer apply: speed of light is the same in all frame.

But, i though that the right way to interpret special relativity was that the maximum and "unique(in all frame)" speed is c, coincidentally this is the speed of light in vacuum.
And not that maximum and "unique(in all frame)" speed is the speed of light, which in vacuum is c.

I think you can see the difference and how this implies different answer to the question.

So, my interpretation is wrong? Or both are equivalent? what am i missing?
I'm not sure I totally understand your question, but the following applies:

Velocity addition uses the universal invariant speed ##c##.

This speed is (somewhat coincidentally) also the speed of light in vacuum.

The speed of light in a medium is not ##c## and so there is nothing special about this speed. In other words, ##c/n## is just another subluminal speed with nothing special in terms of velocity addition or relativistic kinematics.
 
What is your ##r##?

##Dn/c## is wrong. It is the time taken in the glass rest frame.
 
PeroK said:
The speed of light in a medium is not ##c## and so there is nothing special about this speed. In other words, ##c/n## is just another subluminal speed with nothing special in terms of velocity addition or relativistic kinematics.
That was my point. So we agree with that.
Orodruin said:
What is your ##r##?

##Dn/c## is wrong. It is the time taken in the glass rest frame.
r would be, ##r = (c/n - v)/(1-v/cn)##
So here i can't understand, the time in glass rest frame shouldn't be ##D/r = \frac{D}{(c/n - v)/(1-v/cn)}##? ##Dn/c## does not assume that "c/n" is the same in any frame?
 
Herculi said:
So here i can't understand, the time in glass rest frame shouldn't be ##D/r = \frac{D}{(c/n - v)/(1-v/cn)}##? ##Dn/c## does not assume that "c/n" is the same in any frame?
The time in the glass frame must be ##\frac D{c/n}##. That's simply what it means for the speed of light in glass to be ##c/n##.

You can transform to a frame in which the glass moves at ##v## by the usual approach: length contraction and velocity addition, for example. Or, use the Lorentz transformation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top