Inside radius of atomic electron cloud vs Z

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the inner radius of the electron cloud and the atomic number (Z) of an atom. Participants explore whether this inner radius is constant or varies with Z, particularly focusing on the radial probability distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the inner radius of the electron cloud is constant or varies with Z, specifically asking about experimental evidence.
  • Another participant suggests that the concept of "radius" in the context of electron clouds may be conflated, noting that atomic diameters are similar across elements, implying tighter packing of electrons as Z increases.
  • A participant clarifies their interest in the radius at which the maximum radial probability occurs, asserting that this is how the Bohr radius is defined for hydrogen.
  • Further, they express that they are not interested in a "minimum radius" but rather the most likely radial position of the s1 electron as a function of Z, indicating that this varies significantly.
  • One participant describes their method of finding the maximum radial probability by differentiating the radial probability function and solving for r, leading to a formula that suggests a decrease in maximum radial probability with increasing Z.
  • Another participant provides a technical explanation of the radial component of the single-electron wavefunction and discusses the probability density function, emphasizing the mathematical foundations behind the concepts being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and implications of the "inner radius" of the electron cloud, with no consensus reached on whether this radius is constant or varies with Z. The discussion includes both exploratory reasoning and technical explanations, indicating ongoing debate and refinement of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical functions and concepts related to quantum mechanics, including radial wavefunctions and probability densities, without resolving the complexities or assumptions inherent in these discussions.

NLB
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I am interested in knowing if the inside radius of the inner most part of the electron cloud is a constant versus Z. For example is it always the Bohr radius, or does this inner radius change as a function of Z? What is the experimental evidence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you defining/thinking of the radius?
By combining the concept of a "radius" and a "cloud" in the context of electrons, you appear to be mixing up two different models.

All atoms have at least one s1 electron - the radial wavefunction for that state is continuous from 0 to infinity - where would you put the "minimum radius"? Here's how the radial wavefunctions vary with Z. You can google for the shapes.

...anyway, the atomic diameter is roughly the same order of magnitude regardless of Z, which means that the electrons get more tightly packed as Z increases. Which I suspect is what you are asking about.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply. I appreciate the information. Very useful.

I am asking about the radius at which the maximum of the radial probability of the electron occurs. I am not mixing up two different concepts. This is how the Bohr radius is defined now--as the radius of the maximum of radial probability of the s1 electron cloud, for a Hydrogen atom.

I'm not interested in knowing the "minimum radius" of that s1 electron cloud. Rather, I am interested in the most likely radial position of that s1 electron, as a function of Z. From your information, I see that it varies, quite a bit. Thank you.
 
Cool - glad to be able to help.

I know, it can be vexing when people don't just "get" what you are asking, but I have to get a clearer picture if I am to avoid unwittingly side-tracking the thread. Thanks for your understanding on this. :)
 
Thank you again for your help. Another question, though. In the link you gave me, both functions rR(r) and (rR(r))^2 are plotted, but with no explanation or definition.

So, I assumed that rR(r) was the radial probability, and I took the formula of rR(r) and differentiated it with respect to r. Then I set the resulting derivative equal to zero, and solved for r, which would be the r for the maximum of the function rR(r). This should give me what I want--the maximum radial probability as a function of Z. What I got was rmax = a0/Z. (I'm assuming a0 is the Bohr radius of H1 atom, 5.29E-11 meters.) If all this is right, then for U238, where Z=92, then this maximum radial probability of the s1 inner radius is:

(5.29E-11)/(92)=(2.62E-13) meters.

Which, of course, is a quite a bit smaller than the Bohr radius for the H1 atom.

Does this make sense? Am I doing this right, or do I need to work with the function (rR(r))^2 instead?
Thanks again for your help.
 
##R_{nl}(r)## is the radial component of the single-electron wavefunction.
The probability density function is the square modulus.

i.e. The probability of finding an electron in state |n,l> between r and r+dr is ##p(r)dr=|R_{nl}(r)|^2dr## so ##\int_0^\infty p(r)dr = 1## right?

The mean radius is $$\langle r \rangle=\int_0^\infty R_{nl}^\star r R_{nl} dr$$
... since ##R_{nl}## is real, that is where they get the ##r|R_{nl}(r)|^2## from.
It's just the expectation value of r: E[r].

Similarly $$\langle r^2 \rangle=\int_0^\infty r^2 R_{nl}^2 dr$$ ... would be E[r^2].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K