Instantaneous velocity of point on a trochoid

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi
I Googled http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Trochoid.html" but wasn't able to find formulas for the instantaneous velocity of a point on trochoid curves. Does anyone know of an online reference (or know how to find the velocity)

I can get rough estimates by calculating the distance between two "ticks" on a trochoid curve but I want to get exact values if possible.

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Then you learned that parametric equations for a trochoid are
x= a\phi- bsin(\phi) and y= a- bcos(\phi) where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".

I assume you also understand that a "point" on a tronchoid (or any other geometric figure) doesn't have a "velocity"- that's why just look up those words didn't give a "velocity". "Velocity" is a physics concept while "tronchoid" and "points" are purely geometric. Assuming you mean "the instantaneous velocity of a point moving with given speed on a tronchoid", then you get the instantaneous velocity, as Sir Isaac Netwons said, by differentiating the position vector: the x and y components of the velocity vector are given by
\frac{dx}{dt}= \left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]\frac{d\phi}{dt}
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= sin(\phi)\frac{d\phi}{dt}

In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t, that is
\frac{dx}{dt}= \omega\left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= \omega sin(\phi)
 
HallsofIvy said:
In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t, that is
\frac{dx}{dt}= \omega\left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= \omega sin(\phi)

Thanks Halls. I'm guessing you're using \phi to signify the angle but what are you using \omega for? I tried Googling "omega + trig" and several variations on that, but omega seems to be used many different ways depending on the branch of mathematics. Could you give me a concrete example with actual numbers plugged in rather than \omega?

Thanks in advance.
 
Once again, you will not find your answer in mathematics because your question is about physics. I don't know why you are "guessing" anything since I said

1) 'where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".'

2) (as you quoted) "In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t".
\omega= \phi/t is standard (physics) notation for the angular velocity.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Once again, you will not find your answer in mathematics because your question is about physics. I don't know why you are "guessing" anything since I said

1) 'where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".'

2) (as you quoted) "In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t".
\omega= \phi/t is standard (physics) notation for the angular velocity.

Thanks Halls. Much appreciated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top