Instantaneous velocity of point on a trochoid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the instantaneous velocity of a point on a trochoid curve, with initial inquiries about relevant formulas and online references. It clarifies that the concept of "velocity" is rooted in physics rather than geometry, emphasizing the need for differentiation of the position vector to derive velocity components. The parametric equations for a trochoid are provided, along with the expressions for velocity under constant angular speed. The term "omega" is explained as standard notation for angular velocity, and the conversation highlights the distinction between mathematical and physical interpretations of motion. The thread concludes with a request for concrete examples using numerical values.
ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi
I Googled http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Trochoid.html" but wasn't able to find formulas for the instantaneous velocity of a point on trochoid curves. Does anyone know of an online reference (or know how to find the velocity)

I can get rough estimates by calculating the distance between two "ticks" on a trochoid curve but I want to get exact values if possible.

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Then you learned that parametric equations for a trochoid are
x= a\phi- bsin(\phi) and y= a- bcos(\phi) where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".

I assume you also understand that a "point" on a tronchoid (or any other geometric figure) doesn't have a "velocity"- that's why just look up those words didn't give a "velocity". "Velocity" is a physics concept while "tronchoid" and "points" are purely geometric. Assuming you mean "the instantaneous velocity of a point moving with given speed on a tronchoid", then you get the instantaneous velocity, as Sir Isaac Netwons said, by differentiating the position vector: the x and y components of the velocity vector are given by
\frac{dx}{dt}= \left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]\frac{d\phi}{dt}
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= sin(\phi)\frac{d\phi}{dt}

In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t, that is
\frac{dx}{dt}= \omega\left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= \omega sin(\phi)
 
HallsofIvy said:
In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t, that is
\frac{dx}{dt}= \omega\left[a -b cos(\phi)\right]
and
\frac{dy}{dt}= \omega sin(\phi)

Thanks Halls. I'm guessing you're using \phi to signify the angle but what are you using \omega for? I tried Googling "omega + trig" and several variations on that, but omega seems to be used many different ways depending on the branch of mathematics. Could you give me a concrete example with actual numbers plugged in rather than \omega?

Thanks in advance.
 
Once again, you will not find your answer in mathematics because your question is about physics. I don't know why you are "guessing" anything since I said

1) 'where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".'

2) (as you quoted) "In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t".
\omega= \phi/t is standard (physics) notation for the angular velocity.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Once again, you will not find your answer in mathematics because your question is about physics. I don't know why you are "guessing" anything since I said

1) 'where \phi is the angle the line from the point to the center of the "rolling circle".'

2) (as you quoted) "In the simple case of "constant angular speed", \phi(t)= \omega t".
\omega= \phi/t is standard (physics) notation for the angular velocity.

Thanks Halls. Much appreciated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top