Integrable Quantum Field Theory

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I am currently studying Quantum Field Theory (well, for about 3 weeks isch), and it's really good fun! I would like to know how QFT relates Integrable QFT... I don't really know what it is. Can anyone tell me

(i) The theoretical background of Integrable QFT
(ii) The relationship between these two field theories
(iii) What's the most interesting part of Integrable QFT (in your opinion)
(iv) The Ising Model (I have read some papers about it, but I don't really understand what's going on there!)
(v) Is the work on Integrable QFT complete now, or can we still improve it? What direction though?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're asking a hell of a question. Are you familiar with classical integrable systems? The question is so wide that only a short reply is appropriate. There are a variety of approaches, mainly Bethe Anzatz, and quantum inverse scattering are used.

i) The main point of integrable QFT is we need an infinite number of conserved quantities in a field theory. There are an important class of field theories where this is automatically true, and these are conformal field theories, and are useful to statistical mechanics, amongst a variety of other areas of physics. Learn standard QFT first, it's much more relevant to reality.

ii) Hardly any quantum field theories are integrable.

iii) It can describe some materials that actually exist pretty well. This is a miracle...

iv) Don't read Onsager's original paper, it's a nightmare. Also, some care is needed. Ising model is a model of statistical mechanics, where 'integrable' is usually called solvable. Subtle, but imporant differences exist.

v) It's not complete. Calculating beyond the first few conservation laws is hard!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top