Integral Brane World: Why $\oint (A'e^A)' dy = 0$ but $\oint e^A dy \neq 0$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
if the extra coordinate y \in [-\pi,\pi] with A(y)=A(y+2 \pi) and A' is non continuom in -\pi,0,\pi

why

\oint (A'e^A)' dy =0 but \oint e^A dy \neq 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is A?
 
The first integral is a total derivative so

\oint ( A' e^A)' dy= A'(\pi) e^{A(\pi)} - A'(-\pi) e^{A(-\pi)}

which would vanish provided

A'(\pi) = A'(-\pi)

but you seem to imply this may not be the case?

The integral
\oint A' e^A dy= \oint ( e^A)' dy = e^{A(\pi)} - e^{A(-\pi)} =0

is also a total derivative and certainly does vanish due to the boundary conditions.


I see no reason for

\oint ( e^A) dy

to vanish as its not a total derivative so it depends on the explicit form of the function A(y).
 
Finbar said:
The first integral is a total derivative so

\oint ( A' e^A)' dy= A'(\pi) e^{A(\pi)} - A'(-\pi) e^{A(-\pi)}

which would vanish provided

A'(\pi) = A'(-\pi)

but A' is discontinuous in -\pi,0,\pi
 
mitchell porter said:
What is A?
A=|y|
where
A' = 1 , y \in )0,\pi(

A' = -1 , y \in )-\pi,0(

A ' = undefined , y =- \pi, 0,\pi
 
Last edited:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top