Integral convergence and limit comparison test

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of applying the comparison test for integrals, particularly when the integrand's denominator is of the form f(x) - c, which complicates finding suitable bounds. The limit comparison test, typically used for series, is explored as a potential method for evaluating integrals by treating them similarly to series. Several examples suggest that if a corresponding series converges, the integral also converges. Participants clarify that while the integral test and limit comparison test serve similar purposes, they can be used interchangeably under certain conditions. Ultimately, the conversation confirms that both tests can be applied to assess convergence in both integrals and series.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've been thinking about the comparison test for integrals. Usually when I have an integrand where the denominator is f(x) + something positive I can usually find a suitable bound without much trouble. However when the denomoninator of the integrand is f(x) - something positive finding a bound is generally more difficult. This is because I would generally have no idea as to whether the integral converges or not.

So one day I was thinking about the limit comparison test which comes in handy when I have series' where the denominator is something like 2^n - 1. Long story short I used the limit comparison test with integrals by considering the integral as a series(in the mathematically incorrect way) and for a few examples it seemed to work. For example if I have a integral where the integrand is of the form 1/(f(x) - c), c > 0 I just wrote the series(I've omitted the sigma etc) 1/(f(n) - c) and used the limit comparison test for series to determine whether or not the series 1/(f(n)-1) converges. In the few examples I tried, if the corresponding series converges I've also found that the integral converges.

Can the limit comparison test for series be used as a test for integrals in this way? I know that there is an integral test for series but I'm not sure if there is anything the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're a bit confused here...

The integral test for a series determines if a series converges/diverges. The limit comparison test does the same thing to a series. At times, it is preferred to use one over the other if the series is complicated or simple.

So if the question you're asking is whether they can "replace" one another, then I guess the answer is yes.
 
TimNguyen said:
I think you're a bit confused here...

The integral test for a series determines if a series converges/diverges. The limit comparison test does the same thing to a series. At times, it is preferred to use one over the other if the series is complicated or simple.

So if the question you're asking is whether they can "replace" one another, then I guess the answer is yes.
I think what is meant is does the integral test for series work the other way. The answer is yes, the theorem can be formulated as the integral and the series converge or diverge together. Then oncce the question of does this integral coverge is exchanged for does this sum converge any method can be used, including comparison.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntegralTest.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConvergenceTests.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LimitComparisonTest.html
 
Thanks for clearing that up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top