Integral - cylindrical coordinates

In summary, the radius of the circle will be determined by how the angle changes and how much the radius changes when the angle is changed.
  • #1
Chipset3600
79
0
Hello, my best problem is about find the integration limits.
in cylindrical coordinates- where V is limited by the cylinder y^2+z^2=9 and the planes x = 0, y = 3x and z = 0 in the first octant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

So, let's say that you have
\begin{align*}
z&=z\\
y&=r \sin(\theta) \\
x &= r \cos(\theta).
\end{align*}

You have several constraints. How about being inside the cylinder $y^{2}+z^{2}=9$? How about being in the first octant? How about being bound by the three planes? How could you restrict your three integration variables, $z,r,\theta$, to account for these constraints?
 
  • #3
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
So, let's say that you have
\begin{align*}
z&=z\\
y&=r \sin(\theta) \\
x &= r \cos(\theta).
\end{align*}

z=0..3
y= 0..sqrt(9-y^2)
x=0..y/3
it is correct?
 
  • #4
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Hmm. I'm not sure I agree with that.

Step one: determine in what order you're going to integrate. I'd recommend either
$$\iiint r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz$$
or
$$\iiint dz\, r\, dr\, d\theta.$$

Step two: each integral can have variables in the integration limits that appear outside the integral, but not inside. So you could have
$$\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{z} \int_{0}^{\theta}r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz,$$
but not
$$\int_{0}^{\theta} \int_{0}^{z} \int_{0}^{1} r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz.$$
So what constraints does that place on you?
 
  • #5
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Hmm. I'm not sure I agree with that.

Step one: determine in what order you're going to integrate. I'd recommend either
$$\iiint r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz$$
or
$$\iiint dz\, r\, dr\, d\theta.$$

Step two: each integral can have variables in the integration limits that appear outside the integral, but not inside. So you could have
$$\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{z} \int_{0}^{\theta}r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz,$$
but not
$$\int_{0}^{\theta} \int_{0}^{z} \int_{0}^{1} r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz.$$
So what constraints does that place on you?

I prefer the first suggestion.
is correct my plot: http://i.imgur.com/0KfKPLG.jpg
actually i guess my best problem is in 3D graph =/
 
  • #6
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Not too bad. You also have a plane coming out from the $z$-axis, $y=3x$.

So if you're integrating w.r.t. $r$ first, what is it going to range from? You're allowed to have $r=r(\theta,z)$. Then you integrate w.r.t. $\theta$, and you're allowed to have $\theta=\theta(z)$. Finally, you integrate w.r.t. $z$, and $z$ must range from one number to another. What will you have?
 
  • #7
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Not too bad. You also have a plane coming out from the $z$-axis, $y=3x$.

So if you're integrating w.r.t. $r$ first, what is it going to range from? You're allowed to have $r=r(\theta,z)$. Then you integrate w.r.t. $\theta$, and you're allowed to have $\theta=\theta(z)$. Finally, you integrate w.r.t. $z$, and $z$ must range from one number to another. What will you have?

sorry didn't get the english, what is w.r.t?
 
  • #8
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Chipset3600 said:
sorry didn't get the english, what is w.r.t?

My apologies: w.r.t. = "with respect to". It's a common phrase in calculus and analysis when taught in English.
 
  • #9
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
My apologies: w.r.t. = "with respect to". It's a common phrase in calculus and analysis when taught in English.

Sorry but I am not able to follow the reasoning. Maybe the technical english don't help me, i just tried understand something in forum just interpreting the equations.
 
  • #10
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Chipset3600 said:
Sorry but I am not able to follow the reasoning. Maybe the technical english don't help me, i just tried understand something in forum just interpreting the equations.

Ok, let me use math instead. You have the following:
$$\int_{a}^{b} \int_{\theta_{1}(z)}^{\theta_{2}(z)}
\int_{r_{1}(\theta,z)}^{r_{2}( \theta,z)} r \, dr\, d\theta \, dz.$$
What are the functions $r_{1},r_{2},\theta_{1},\theta_{2}$ and the constants $a,b$?
 
  • #11
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Ok, let me use math instead. You have the following:
$$\int_{a}^{b} \int_{\theta_{1}(z)}^{\theta_{2}(z)}
\int_{r_{1}(\theta,z)}^{r_{2}( \theta,z)} r \, dr\, d\theta \, dz.$$
What are the functions $r_{1},r_{2},\theta_{1},\theta_{2}$ and the constants $a,b$?

z= 0..3
theta= 0..pi/2
r= 0..3 or the radius will not be ever 3 depending of angle?
 
  • #12
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

I don't think you've quite got it yet. Your $r$ is going to have to depend on either $\theta$ or $z$ or both. You know that $r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}$, and that $\theta=\tan^{-1}(y/x)$. Can you use these relationships to find an upper bound for $r$? I would agree with the lower bound: $0<r$.

Try this: $y^{2}+z^{2}=3$, so $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=3+x^{2}$, and thus $r^{2}+z^{2}=3+x^{2}=3+r^{2}\cos^{2}(\theta)$. Or, more directly, you can say that since $y=r \sin(\theta)$, that $r^{2} \sin^{2}(\theta)+z^{2}=3$. Solving for $r^{2}$ yields that
$$r^{2}= \frac{3-z^{2}}{ \sin^{2}( \theta)}.$$
Can you continue from here?
 
  • #13
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
I don't think you've quite got it yet. Your $r$ is going to have to depend on either $\theta$ or $z$ or both. You know that $r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}$, and that $\theta=\tan^{-1}(y/x)$. Can you use these relationships to find an upper bound for $r$? I would agree with the lower bound: $0<r$.

Try this: $y^{2}+z^{2}=3$, so $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=3+x^{2}$, and thus $r^{2}+z^{2}=3+x^{2}=3+r^{2}\cos^{2}(\theta)$. Or, more directly, you can say that since $y=r \sin(\theta)$, that $r^{2} \sin^{2}(\theta)+z^{2}=3$. Solving for $r^{2}$ yields that
$$r^{2}= \frac{3-z^{2}}{ \sin^{2}( \theta)}.$$
Can you continue from here?

So the radius go from 0 to sqrt[(3-z^2)/(sin^2(theta))]
 
  • #14
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Chipset3600 said:
So the radius go from 0 to sqrt[(3-z^2)/(sin^2(theta))]

Right. Now, what are the limits on $\theta$? Hint: it'll be partly determined by the plane $y=3x$.
 
  • #15
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Right. Now, what are the limits on $\theta$? Hint: it'll be partly determined by the plane $y=3x$.

Can you show me the graph of bounded area please?
 
  • #16
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Chipset3600 said:
Can you show me the graph of bounded area please?

Alas, I do not have very good graphing or scanning capabilities where I am. The plane $y=3x$ does not depend on $z$, so it'll look the same no matter what $z$ is. It will intersect with the $z$-axis, and come out of it at an angle with respect to the $x$-axis. Can you find what that angle is?
 
  • #17
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Alas, I do not have very good graphing or scanning capabilities where I am. The plane $y=3x$ does not depend on $z$, so it'll look the same no matter what $z$ is. It will intersect with the $z$-axis, and come out of it at an angle with respect to the $x$-axis. Can you find what that angle is?

from tan^-1(3) to pi/2?
 
  • #18
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Close. I think it's $0$ to $\tan^{-1}(3)$.
 
  • #19
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Close. I think it's $0$ to $\tan^{-1}(3)$.

So the integral be: \(\displaystyle \int_{0}^{3}\int_{0}^{\arctan 3 }\int_{0}^{\sqrt{\frac{3-z^2}{sin^2(\theta)}}} rdr d\theta dz\) ?? this equal to Zero :s
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

I don't think the integral will be zero. You have
\begin{align*}
\int_{0}^{3} \int_{0}^{\tan^{-1}(3)} \int_{0}^{\frac{\sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{\sin(\theta)}}
r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz&=
\int_{0}^{3} \int_{0}^{ \tan^{-1}(3)} \left( \frac{r^{2}}{2} \right) \Bigg|_{0}^{ \frac{ \sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{ \sin( \theta)}}
d\theta\, dz\\
&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{3} \int_{0}^{ \tan^{-1}(3)} \frac{3-z^{2}}{\sin^{2}( \theta)}
d\theta\, dz\\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( \int_{0}^{3}(3-z^{2})\,dz \right) \left( \int_{0}^{\tan^{-1}(3)} \csc^{2}( \theta) \, d\theta \right).
\end{align*}
Can you finish?
 
  • #21
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Hmm. Not sure I can finish, actually. The $\theta$ integral doesn't converge.

Can you write down the original problem statement, word-for-word, please?
 
  • #22
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Ackbach said:
Hmm. Not sure I can finish, actually. The $\theta$ integral doesn't converge.

Can you write down the original problem statement, word-for-word, please?
Calculate the ∭zdV
In cylindrical coordinates: where V is limited by the cylinder y^2+z^2=9 and the planes x = 0, y = 3x and z = 0 in the first octant.
 
  • #23
Re: Integral- cylindrical coordinates

Chipset3600 said:
Calculate the ∭zdV
In cylindrical coordinates: where V is limited by the cylinder y^2+z^2=9 and the planes x = 0, y = 3x and z = 0 in the first octant.
I have kept away from this discussion because I could not see a convenient way of solving the problem using cylindrical coordinates. In fact, I think it is much better not to use them. Suppose instead that we look at a cross-section of $V$ at a fixed level of $z$. The cross-section looks like this:

We must have $y$ lying between $-\sqrt{9-z^2}$ and $+\sqrt{9-z^2}$. We also need $x\geqslant0$. Next, the line $y=3x$ must mark the boundary of the cross-section. But which side of that line should $V$ be on? The wording of the problem does not make that clear, and that seems to be one of the reasons that this problem is causing so much discussion. But if $V$ is to be bounded, it is clear from the picture that it must lie to the left of the line, so that the cross-section is the pink shaded region in the diagram. This is a triangle whose height is $\sqrt{9-z^2}$ and whose width is one-third of that. Thus its area is $\frac16(9-z^2)$. Finally, since $V$ lies in the positive octant, we must have $0\leqslant z\leqslant 3$. It follows that \(\displaystyle \iiint z\,dV = \int_0^3 \tfrac16z(9-z^2)\,dz,\) which is an easy integral.​
 

Attachments

  • cylinder.jpg
    cylinder.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 66
  • #24
Here's a 3D picture. Surfaces in 3D are hard for a lot of people to visualize. For me, I'd stick with Cartesian coords or go with a different parameterization than cylindrical polars. (Sorry it's so large - maybe someone can scale it down abit.
View attachment 902
 

Attachments

  • picMHB.jpg
    picMHB.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 62
  • #25
Thanks much for the corrections from Opalg and the picture from Jester. So, if you must do the integral in cylindrical, the appropriate integral is
$$\int_{0}^{3} \int_{\tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}} \int_{0}^{\frac{\sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{\sin(\theta)}}
r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz.$$
This time, the $\csc^{2}$ integral will converge.
 
  • #26
Ackbach said:
Thanks much for the corrections from Opalg and the picture from Jester. So, if you must do the integral in cylindrical, the appropriate integral is
$$\int_{0}^{3} \int_{\tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}} \int_{0}^{\frac{\sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{\sin(\theta)}}
r\, dr\, d\theta\, dz.$$
This time, the $\csc^{2}$ integral will converge.

Now make's more sense, but the integral still equal to zero
View attachment 903
 

Attachments

  • wolf.png
    wolf.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 62
  • #27
Oops. I'm still missing something. You were asked to compute $\iiint z \, dV$. You must insert a $z$ into the integrand.
 
  • #28
Ackbach said:
Oops. I'm still missing something. You were asked to compute $\iiint z \, dV$. You must insert a $z$ into the integrand.

Exactly... if y^2+z^2= 9 then z= sqrt(9-y^2)

Parametrizing, am i wrong if i say that z= sqrt(9-(rsin(theta))^2) ?
 
  • #29
I don't think there's a need to parametrize. $z$ is an accepted variable already in cylindrical coordinates. Besides, the equation you're using is the equation of the portion of the cylinder which is enclosing the 3D region over which you are integrating. In other words, that equation does not hold over the entire region. So your integral is as follows:
\begin{align*}
\int_{0}^{3} \int_{\tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}} \int_{0}^{\frac{\sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{\sin(\theta)}}
zr\, dr\, d\theta\, dz
&= \int_{0}^{3} z \int_{ \tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}}
\left( \frac{r^{2}}{2} \right) \Bigg|_{0}^{ \frac{ \sqrt{3-z^{2}}}{ \sin( \theta)}} \, d \theta \, dz \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{3} z \int_{ \tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}}
\frac{3-z^{2}}{\sin^{2}( \theta)}\, d \theta \, dz \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( \int_{0}^{3}(3z-z^{3}) \, dz \right) \left( \int_{ \tan^{-1}(3)}^{ \frac{ \pi}{2}} \csc^{2}( \theta) \, d \theta \right).
\end{align*}
 
  • #30
Jester said:
Here's a 3D picture. Surfaces in 3D are hard for a lot of people to visualize. For me, I'd stick with Cartesian coords or go with a different parameterization than cylindrical polars. (Sorry it's so large - maybe someone can scale it down a bit.
View attachment 905
The question asked for a solution using cylindrical coordinates, and Jester's helpful diagram provides a clue for doing this. The usual way to transform Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical is to replace $x$ and $y$ by $r\cos\theta$ and $r\sin\theta$, and to leave $z$ alone. But this problem refers to the cylinder $y^2+z^2=9$, which has its axis in the $x$-direction, so it makes much more sense to replace $y$ and $z$ by $r\cos\theta$ and $r\sin\theta$, and to leave $x$ alone.

If we let $y = r\cos\theta$ and $z = r\sin\theta$, then it is clear from Jester's diagram that the region $V$ is given by
$0\leqslant\theta\leqslant \pi/2$,
$0\leqslant r\leqslant 3$,
$0\leqslant x\leqslant y/3 = \frac13r\cos\theta$.​
Therefore (doing the $x$-integral first) $$\begin{aligned} \iiint z\,dV &= \int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^3\int_0^{\frac13r\cos\theta}r\sin\theta\,dx\,rdrd\theta \\ &= \int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^3\tfrac13r^3\sin\theta\cos\theta \,drd\theta \\ &= \int_0^{\pi/2}\tfrac{27}4\sin\theta\cos\theta\,d\theta \\ &= \int_0^{\pi/2}\tfrac{27}8\sin(2\theta)\,d\theta \\ &= \biggl[-\tfrac{27}{16} \cos(2\theta) \biggr]_0^{\pi/2} = \frac{27}8.\end{aligned}$$ Happily, this agrees with with the answer obtained by my previous method.
 

Attachments

  • Jester.jpg
    Jester.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 53
  • #31
I understood, thank you guys =)
 

1. What are integral - cylindrical coordinates?

Integral - cylindrical coordinates are a type of coordinate system used in mathematics and physics. They are a way of representing points in three-dimensional space using a combination of two angles and a distance from the origin.

2. How are integral - cylindrical coordinates different from other coordinate systems?

Integral - cylindrical coordinates are different from other coordinate systems, such as Cartesian or spherical coordinates, because they use a combination of angles and a distance instead of just three distances. This makes them useful for representing objects with cylindrical symmetry, such as pipes or cylinders.

3. What is the formula for converting between integral - cylindrical coordinates and Cartesian coordinates?

The formula for converting from integral - cylindrical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates is x = ρcos(ϕ), y = ρsin(ϕ), and z = z, where ρ is the distance from the origin, ϕ is the angle measured from the positive x-axis, and z is the distance along the z-axis.

4. How are integral - cylindrical coordinates used in integration?

Integral - cylindrical coordinates are often used in integration when dealing with objects that have cylindrical symmetry. This is because the equations for calculating volume, surface area, and other properties of these objects are often simpler in integral - cylindrical coordinates than in other coordinate systems.

5. What are some real-world applications of integral - cylindrical coordinates?

Integral - cylindrical coordinates have many real-world applications, including in engineering, physics, and astronomy. They are often used to model and calculate properties of cylindrical objects, such as pipes, cylinders, and antennas. They are also used in spherical and cylindrical coordinate systems to map the Earth's surface and in polar coordinates to describe the motion of objects in space.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
411
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
296
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top