Integral of e^iwt: Solving for \omega & t Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter skateboarding
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function \( e^{i\omega t'} \) from 0 to \( t \) is evaluated as \( \frac{1}{i\omega}(e^{i\omega t} - 1) \). This integral approaches zero when \( \omega \) is significantly larger than \( t \) due to rapid oscillations, while it yields a non-zero value when \( t \) is comparable to \( \omega \). The discussion highlights the importance of correctly evaluating the integral and understanding the relationship between \( \omega \) and \( t \) in perturbation theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex exponentials and Euler's formula
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, specifically improper integrals
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory in physics
  • Basic concepts of oscillatory functions and their integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of oscillatory integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the Dirac delta function and its applications in physics
  • Explore the implications of Fourier transforms in relation to oscillatory functions
  • Investigate the role of complex analysis in evaluating integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics, as well as mathematicians interested in complex analysis and integral calculus.

skateboarding
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
For particle location, perturbation theory, etc, I see the following integral.

\LARGE \int_0^t { e^{i\omega t^'}}dt^'

Where \omega is some constant, or frequency. It says in my text that this is equal to 0 if \omega is not close to 0. My logic leads me to think that when \omega is large, the function oscillates many times between 0 and t, so it's integral is 0. However, when I carry out the integral explicitly, it is less clear.

\LARGE {\int_0^t {e^{i\omega t^'}}dt^'} = \frac{e^{i\omega t}}{i\omega} = \cos{\omega t} + i\sin{\omega t} - 1}

My question is, from the expression above, how to I show that this integral is 0 or close to zero? I think it depends on the values chosen for \omega and t. If t is greater than \omega, the integral should give a small number, and if t is close to \omega, the integral should give some non zero value. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You made a mistake in evaluating the integral, it should be:

<br /> \LARGE {\int_0^t {e^{i\omega t^&#039;}}dt^&#039;} = \frac{1}{i\omega}\left(e^{i\omega t}-1\right)

Do you see why?
 
Tangent87 said:
You made a mistake in evaluating the integral, it should be:

<br /> \LARGE {\int_0^t {e^{i\omega t^&#039;}}dt^&#039;} = \frac{1}{i\omega}\left(e^{i\omega t}-1\right)

Do you see why?

Oops, forgot the denominator. I think that for large t, This integral becomes a delta function. Still working on it. Thanks.
 
fixed it

For particle location, perturbation theory, etc, I see the following integral.

\LARGE \int_0^t { e^{i\omega t^&#039;}}dt^&#039;

Where \omega is some constant, or frequency. It says in my text that this is equal to 0 if \omega is not close to 0. My logic leads me to think that when \omega is large, the function oscillates many times between 0 and t, so it's integral is 0. However, when I carry out the integral explicitly, it is less clear.

\LARGE {\int_0^t {e^{i\omega t^&#039;}}dt^&#039;} = e^{i\omega t}}{i\omega} = \frac {\cos{\omega t} + i\sin{\omega t} - 1

My question is, from the expression above, how to I show that this integral is 0 or close to zero? I think it depends on the values chosen for \omega and t. If t is greater than \omega, the integral should give a small number, and if t is close to \omega, the integral should give some non zero value. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K