Integrate (1+Z)/(2-2Z): Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter franky2727
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function (1+Z)/(2-2Z), exploring various methods and approaches to solve the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods for integration, including polynomial long division, u-substitution, and separating the fraction. Questions arise about the effectiveness of these methods and the complexity involved in each approach.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different strategies for tackling the integral, with some suggesting simpler forms of the expression. There is an ongoing exploration of various interpretations and methods without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the methods and substitutions, indicating a need for clarification on the steps involved in the integration process.

franky2727
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
how do i integrate (1+Z)/(2-2Z)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?
 
[tex]\int\frac{1+Z}{2- 2Z}dZ= \frac{1}{2}\int\frac{1+Z}{1- Z}dZ[/tex]
Does that help?

and
[tex]\frac{1+ Z}{1- Z}= -1- ?[/tex]
 
Try a u substitution. What's the obvious one?
 
substitute 2-2Z for u? but then I've still got something over something else and still don't get what method to use :S
 
As HallsOfIvy pointed out, you can just use polynomial long division to decompose the fraction into something more integrable.
 
franky2727 said:
substitute 2-2Z for u? but then I've still got something over something else and still don't get what method to use :S

If u=2-2Z then Z=(2-u)/2. Substitute that into 1+Z. Now it's all u's.
 
Dick said it all. You need to write Z in terms of u, then you need to find dz/du by differentiating that. You substitute everything in and integrate.
 
But you will still have to divide the fraction. Seems simpler just to reduce the original fraction.
 
  • #10
If you factor out the 2, sub u = 1-z and z = 1-u, all the work has been done for you. Just separate the fraction and integrate.
 
  • #11
And, one more time, why not just "separate the fraction" (by which I assume you mean "divide") without the substitution?
 
  • #12
If you substitute [itex]u=2-2z[/itex], and you simplify it, you will end up with this at one point:

[itex]-\frac12 \int \left( \frac{2}{u} - \frac12 \right) \ \mathrm{d}u \implies \frac14 \int 1 \ \mathrm{d}u - \int \frac{1}{u} \ \mathrm{d}u[/itex]

Integrate this and remember to substitute [itex]u=2-2z[/itex] in the end to get the final answer.
 
  • #13
[tex]u = z-1[/tex]
[tex]du = dz[/tex]
[tex]z = u + 1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{1+z}{1-z}dz =\frac{1}{-2} \int \frac{1+z}{z-1}dz =[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{-2} \left( \int \frac{dz}{z-1} + \int \frac{z}{z-1}dz \right) =[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{-2} \left( \int \frac{du}{u} + \int \frac{u + 1}{u} du \right) =[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{-2} \left( \int \frac{du}{u} + \int \frac{du}{u} + \int du \right) =[/tex]

Continue from this point.
 
  • #14
And if you use the fact that [tex]\frac{1+z}{2-2z}= -\frac{1}{2}\left(1+ \frac{1}{1-z}\right)[/tex] you have
[tex]\int \frac{1+z}{2- 2z}dz= -\frac{1}{2}\int (1+ \frac{1}{z-1}dz= -\frac{1}{2}(z+ ln|z-1|)+ C[/tex]

That seems simpler to me.
 
  • #15
HallsofIvy said:
And if you use the fact that [tex]\frac{1+z}{2-2z}= -\frac{1}{2}\left(1+ \frac{1}{1-z}\right)[/tex] you have
[tex]\int \frac{1+z}{2- 2z}dz= -\frac{1}{2}\int (1+ \frac{1}{z-1}dz= -\frac{1}{2}(z+ ln|z-1|)+ C[/tex]

That seems simpler to me.

Your method is indeed much simpler. =)
 
  • #16
I don't think it's MUCH simpler. It's six of one and half a dozen of the other. Neither one is all that complicated. If you ask me. And you don't have to.
 
  • #17
HallsofIvy said:
And if you use the fact that [tex]\frac{1+z}{2-2z}= -\frac{1}{2}\left(1+ \frac{1}{1-z}\right)[/tex]

That seems simpler to me.

That's false though... Just check z=0 the left side gives 1/2, but the right side gives -(1/2)(2)=-1...
 
  • #18
At this point I'm wondering who cares. franky2727 hasn't checked in since the initial post. I guess this thread is just getting a lot of attention because nothing else is going on.
 
  • #19
d_leet said:
That's false though... Just check z=0 the left side gives 1/2, but the right side gives -(1/2)(2)=-1...

Typo: I meant
[tex]-\frac{1}{2}\left(1+ \frac{2}{z-1}\right)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K