Integrate [itex]\int_0^1\frac{\sin(\pi x)}{1-x}dx[/itex]

  • Thread starter Thread starter funcalys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \int_0^1\frac{\sin(\pi x)}{1-x}dx does not have an elementary antiderivative, making direct calculation via the Newton-Leibniz formula unfeasible. The discussion suggests using variable substitution with t = 1-x, leading to the result I = \text{Si}(\pi), where \text{Si}(x) = \int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{t} \, dt. Expanding \sin(t) into a power series allows for term-by-term integration, yielding a series representation for the integral. Additionally, numerical integration methods, such as Simpson's rule, are recommended for practical computation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and the Newton-Leibniz formula
  • Familiarity with the sine integral function, \text{Si}(x)
  • Knowledge of power series expansions
  • Basic concepts of numerical integration methods, including Simpson's rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the sine integral function, \text{Si}(x), and its properties
  • Study power series expansions and their applications in integration
  • Explore contour integration techniques for complex integrals
  • Investigate numerical integration methods, focusing on Simpson's rule and its accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and professionals dealing with advanced calculus, particularly those interested in integral calculus and numerical methods.

funcalys
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


\int_0^1\frac{\sin(\pi x)}{1-x}dx

Homework Equations


\int \frac{\sin (\pi x)}{1-x}=Si(\pi-\pi x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I was stuck on the above integral while solving an exercise, I found out earlier on Wolfram that this integral doesn't probably have an elementary antiderivative representation so I cannot just calculate it directly by Newton-Leibniz formula. Integration by parts is not very viable in this case also. Maybe this needs the notion of contour integration to be solved? Any idea guys?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried expanding the denominator as a power series?
 
Yeah, looks like it yielded some positive results finally , thanks very much for your help.
 
Oh, I did expand the denominator as a power series and then integrate term by term by resulting series, but I can't proceed to the next step. The general formula for arbitrary k is too complicated for me.
 
Then stop with some finite power for an approximation.
 
funcalys said:
Oh, I did expand the denominator as a power series and then integrate term by term by resulting series, but I can't proceed to the next step. The general formula for arbitrary k is too complicated for me.

If you change variables to t = 1-x you will get the value of the integral as ##I = \text{Si}(\pi),## where
\text{Si}(x) = \int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{t} \, dt. You can very easily expand ##\sin(t)## in a power series and get a very straightforward series for ##\text{Si}(x)## in powers of x. That will give you a simple-enough series for I in powers of ##\pi##.
 
Thank HallsofIvy.
Ray Vickson said:
If you change variables to t = 1-x you will get the value of the integral as ##I = \text{Si}(\pi),## where
\text{Si}(x) = \int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{t} \, dt. You can very easily expand ##\sin(t)## in a power series and get a very straightforward series for ##\text{Si}(x)## in powers of x. That will give you a simple-enough series for I in powers of ##\pi##.
This seems like the most plausible way to handle that imo :biggrin:. Thanks.
 
funcalys said:
Thank HallsofIvy.

This seems like the most plausible way to handle that imo :biggrin:. Thanks.

Numerical integration methods such as Simpson's rule should work well also.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K