Integrate x^x^x: What do you think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alejandroman8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
AI Thread Summary
Integrating the function x^x^x is complex, as there is no elementary function that serves as its derivative. A suggestion is to approach it numerically, while some participants discuss using the Lambert function for transformation. By defining x^x as z, the integration can be reformulated, but it remains complicated. The discussion also references a specific function, Sphd(1,1;x), as a potential primitive, but skepticism about its simplicity is expressed. Overall, the integration of x^x^x is acknowledged as a challenging problem with no straightforward solution.
Alejandroman8
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how integrate x^x^x ?my teacher ask me)what do you think about it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


I would suggest numerically! Certainly there is no elementary function that has that as its derivative.
 


I don't know, but I thougt in the Lambert function

If we define x^x=z, then, x=\frac{ln(z)}{W(ln(z)}, where W is the Lambert function. So we can write

x^z=\left(\frac{ln(z)}{W(ln(z)}\right)^z, and then integrate.

I know, that this is awfull, but, maybe it can help or give any clue.
 


Thanks)
but i think it took not one hour to take the result
 


@ Grufey : False because you forgot the dx.
So, even more complicated !
.
@ Alejandroman8 : a primitive of x^(x^x) is the function Sphd(1,1;x)
Is it a joke ? Just read the preamble of "The Somophore's Dream Function" :
http://www.scribd.com/JJacquelin/documents
A so simple answer ! (§.12) :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top