Integrating exp(x^2): Solution & Explanation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wishe Deom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of the definite integral \(\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-2ax^{2}} dx\) where \(a\) is a positive real number. Participants explore various methods for solving this integral, including the use of polar coordinates and Fubini's theorem, while addressing the challenges associated with limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in finding the integral and states a belief that the answer is \(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}}\), but lacks the method to derive it.
  • Another participant suggests multiplying two integrals of the same form and converting to polar coordinates as a potential method for solving the integral.
  • A participant questions the validity of multiplying the integrals, noting that the product of integrals is not necessarily equal to the integral of the products.
  • It is proposed that using Fubini's theorem may justify the interchange of integrals in this context.
  • One participant mentions that by recognizing the symmetry of the integral, it can be simplified to \(2\int_0^\infty e^{-2ax^2}dx\).
  • Another participant outlines steps involving the use of Fubini's theorem to express the double integral in polar coordinates, emphasizing the need to consider the differential area in polar coordinates.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the limits of integration when transitioning to polar coordinates, with a participant noting confusion about the limits for \(r\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of certain mathematical approaches, particularly regarding the multiplication of integrals and the application of Fubini's theorem. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the best method to evaluate the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions made when applying Fubini's theorem and the need for careful consideration of the limits of integration in polar coordinates.

Wishe Deom
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

This is my first post on the forum; I'm pretty sure my question fits in this section.

I am having a lot of difficulty finding the definite integral
\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-2ax^{2}} dx
where a is positive and real.
I know the answer is \\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}}, but I have no idea at all how to get there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint: write another integral of that form, but with y as the variable. multiply them together. convert to polar coordinates, and integrate. then take the square root.
 
I will try this, but why would this work? As far as I understand it, the product of the integrals is not necessarily equal to the integral of the products.

Is this what you are suggesting I try?

\int{\inf}_{-\inf}e{-ax{2}}e{-ay{2}}dxdy
 
\int \int f(x) g(y) dx dy = \int f(x) dx \int g(y) dy

(most of the time)

and yes, I'm suggesting you look at:

\sqrt{\int \int e^{-\alpha x^2} e^{-\alpha y^2} dxdy
 
As a bonus, once you convince yourself that
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\alpha x^2} dx = \sqrt{{\frac{\pi}{\alpha}},
you can easily calculate integrals of the form
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^{2n} e^{-\alpha x^2} dx
by differentiating the first expression (under the integral sign, on the left) with respect to alpha n times. This is a very useful fact.
 
Wishe Deom said:
I will try this, but why would this work? As far as I understand it, the product of the integrals is not necessarily equal to the integral of the products.

To justify the interchange you can use "[URL Theorem[/URL].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for all the help. I'm well on my way, but I am having trouble with the limits of integration. Since x and y go from -inf to inf, what are the new limits?

Since r = sqrt(x^2+y^2), it seems that r goes from inf to inf, which would result in 0. I know, logically, r should be 0 to infinity, but how do I calculate that?
 
Wishe Deom said:
I will try this, but why would this work? As far as I understand it, the product of the integrals is not necessarily equal to the integral of the products.

Is this what you are suggesting I try?

\int{\inf}_{-\inf}e{-ax{2}}e{-ay{2}}dxdy
<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="fluxions" data-source="post: 2888425" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-title"> fluxions said: </div> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> \int \int f(x) g(y) dx dy = \int f(x) dx \int g(y) dy <br /> <br /> (most of the time) </div> </div> </blockquote> This is &quot;Fubini&#039;s Theorem&quot;
 
1) \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2ax^2}dx= 2\int_0^\infty e^{-2ax^2}dx [/itex]<br /> by symmetry.<br /> <br /> 2) If you let I= \int_{-\infty}^\infty} e^{-2ax^2}dx<br /> then \frac{I}{2}= \int_0^\infty e^{-2ax^2}dx<br /> and it is also true that <br /> \frac{I}{2}= \int_0^\infty e^{-2ay^2}dy<br /> since that is the same integral with a different &quot;dummy&quot; variable.<br /> <br /> so<br /> 3) I^2/4= \left(\int_0^\infty e^{-2ax^2}dx\right)\left(\int_0^\infty e^{-2ay^2}dy\right)<br /> = \int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty e^{-2a(x^2+ y^2)} dy dx<br /> by Fubini&#039;s theorem.<br /> <br /> You can interpret that last as a double integral over the first quadrant and change to polar coordinates. Remember that the &quot;differential of area&quot; in polar coordinates is r drd\theta and that \theta goes from 0 to \pi/2 in the first quadrant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K