Integrating the function 1/x^2. Something I don't understand

AI Thread Summary
The integration of the function f(x) = 1/x^2 results in -1/x + C, but the integral from -1 to 1 is problematic due to a discontinuity at x = 0. Since f(x) is not continuous over the interval [-1, 1], it is classified as an improper integral. This means the integral does not converge in the traditional sense, leading to the confusion about the negative result. The correct interpretation is that the integral diverges to infinity rather than yielding a finite value. Understanding the nature of discontinuities is crucial for proper integration.
VietDao29
Homework Helper
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
3
While integrating the function f(x) = \frac{1}{x ^ 2}, I came across something I don't understand:
\int \frac{1}{x ^ 2}dx = - \frac{1}{x} + C
Let f(x) := \frac{1}{x ^ 2}
f(x) > 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}
\int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx = -1 - (-(-1)) = -2:confused:
Why this happened? :confused: It's obvious that f(x) &gt; 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R} and -1 < 1, but why \int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx &lt; 0
:confused:
I think it should be : \int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx = + \infty
What have I done wrong? :cry:
Viet Dao,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VietDao29 said:
While integrating the function f(x) = \frac{1}{x ^ 2}, I came across something I don't understand:
\int \frac{1}{x ^ 2}dx = - \frac{1}{x} + C
Let f(x) := \frac{1}{x ^ 2}
f(x) &gt; 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}
\int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx = -1 - (-(-1)) = -2:confused:
Why this happened? :confused: It's obvious that f(x) &gt; 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R} and -1 < 1, but why \int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx &lt; 0
:confused:
I think it should be : \int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx = + \infty
What have I done wrong? :cry:
Viet Dao,

It's an improper integral.
 
Last edited:
VietDao29 said:
...I think it should be : \int_{-1}^{1}f(x)dx = + \infty
What have I done wrong? :cry:
Viet Dao,
There's a discontinuity in f(x) at x = 0.

You can't integrate over a range that includes a discontituity.
 
The fundamental theorem does not hold as 1/x^2 is not continuous at x=0. It is also an improper integral that does not converge in the traditional sense.
 
Last edited:
Yup, thanks for the help. I see what I missed now. :smile:
Viet Dao,
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top