Integration by Parts: Assigning u & dv with LIPATE Rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the LIPATE rule for integration by parts, specifically for the integral of ln(1+x^2)dx. Participants confirm that assigning u = ln(1+x^2) and dv = dx is valid, despite initial concerns about its effectiveness. The conversation also touches on the integration of improper rational functions and the use of u-substitution as an alternative method. Additionally, participants provide insights on solving integrals involving trigonometric identities, emphasizing the importance of transforming expressions for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts and the LIPATE rule.
  • Familiarity with improper rational functions and polynomial long division.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications in integration.
  • Basic skills in u-substitution for integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the LIPATE rule in detail for effective integration by parts.
  • Learn polynomial long division techniques for simplifying improper rational functions.
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their applications in calculus.
  • Practice u-substitution with various integral problems to enhance problem-solving skills.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as anyone seeking to improve their understanding of trigonometric integrals and rational function integration.

zenity
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm a bit confused as to what I should assign u and dv in this integration by parts:

ln(1+x^2)dx

I remember a general rule called the "LIPATE" rule... which is basically Logarithms, inverse trigs, poly, algebra, trig, then exponentials...

Now... would I assign u = ln(1+x^2)? and dv = dx?

That kind of defeats the purpose of integration by parts... doesn't it?

I'm probably not assigning u and dv properly... so if anybody can lend me a hand, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zenity said:
Now... would I assign u = ln(1+x^2)? and dv = dx?

Yes.

That kind of defeats the purpose of integration by parts... doesn't it?

No, it works like a charm. Try it and see.
 
Ok... so this is what happens after I work it out

u=ln(1+x)^2 du=2x/(x^2+1)

dv=dx v=x

ln(1+x^2)x - integral [ 2x^2/(1+x^2)

Using a calc, I found out that the integral works out to be x - arctan(x)

... but I don't know how to do it ... any pointers?
 
Your "new" integrand is an improper rational function. They should have beat in into your head during your precalc courses that improper rational functions should be decomposed into a polynomial plus a proper rational function, via long division.

Try that, and then see if it's not clear what to do.
 
I'll need a quick refresher on that... I don't remember exactly how to do that...
I'll take a look around on the net. In the meantime, I am 100% stuck on this question:

integral of x^7/(1+x^4)^(3/2)

I've tried assigning u=x^7 and dv="the bottom part"

unfortunately... I don't know where I'm headed.

I'm sorry for all these questions. I have a hard time trying to determine what I should assign to u and dv. Is there a good tutorial online or something that can help me in this area?
 
zenity said:
In the meantime, I am 100% stuck on this question:
integral of x^7/(1+x^4)^(3/2)

Don't get so caught up in integration by parts that you forget the other stuff you used to know. This can be done with a simple u-substitution. I'll let you figure out what u is supposed to be.
 
Thanks... but this section in the book insists that we use integration by parts in order to solve these questions... (Although using substitution as a secondary method would be acceptable I think).

I've solved the questions... but I'm now stuck on integration and trigonometric identities...

Integral of sec(x)^4 / tan(x)^2

I've tried using sec(x)^2 = tan(x)^2 + 1 and vice versa, but I don't seem to be getting anywhere with that. If someone could possibly lend a few hinters! Thanks!
 
You can just change everything to sin(x) and cos(x), then go from there.
So:
\int \frac{\sec ^ 4 x}{\tan ^ 2 x} dx = \int \frac{\cos ^ 2 x}{\sin ^ 2 x \cos ^ 4 x}dx = \int \frac{1}{\sin ^ 2 x \cos ^ 2 x}dx
There's sin(x) and cos(x) in the denominator, so you may want to change the numerator a bit so that it also has sin(x) and cos(x).
... = \int \frac{\cos ^ 2 x + \sin ^ 2 x}{\sin ^ 2 x \cos ^ 2 x}dx = ...
Can you go from here?
--------------------
Or if you want to continue doing it your way, then you can change everything into tan(x).
So:
\int \frac{\sec ^ 4 x}{\tan ^ 2 x} dx = \int \frac{(1 + \tan ^ 2 x) ^ 2}{\tan ^ 2 x} dx = \int \frac{dx}{\tan ^ 2 x} + \int \tan ^ 2 x dx + \int 2 dx
Now you can change tan(x) to sin(x) and cos(x): tan(x) = sin(x) / cos(x). And use sin2x + cos2x = 1 to solve the problem.
---------------
Anyway, it's always good that you start another thread for another problem, instead of using the old one...
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K