Integration by parts can you solve this problem please

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral ∫x²e^(-x³)dx can be solved using substitution rather than integration by parts. The discussion highlights that setting u = x³ simplifies the integral significantly, making it more straightforward. Participants express skepticism about the necessity of using integration by parts, suggesting that a substitution method is more efficient. Ultimately, the consensus is to utilize u-substitution for a clearer solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with u-substitution technique
  • Knowledge of integration by parts method
  • Basic proficiency in handling exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the u-substitution method in detail
  • Practice solving integrals using integration by parts
  • Explore advanced techniques for integrating exponential functions
  • Review examples of integrals that can be simplified through substitution
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians seeking alternative integration techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integral calculus methods.

idir93
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
calculate : ∫x²e-x3dx by parts please i need details :) thank you very much
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Don't use integration by parts! Let u= x^3.
 


Is it necessary to solve this using integration by parts? There's a nice substitution that makes the integral straightforward. I couldn't easily see a nice way to separate the integral.
 


i know that i can do it with u-substitution but I'm asked to integrate it by parts !
 


Then let u= 1/3, dv= 3x^2e^{-x^3}
 
i do not think that it's legal :) i mean that there is surely another method thank you anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K