Integration By Parts: Solving int.arctan(2x)dx for Calculus Homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function arctan(2x) with respect to x, specifically using the technique of integration by parts. Participants are exploring the correct approach to solve the integral and verifying the results of their attempts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve the integral using integration by parts and seeks confirmation of their answer. Some participants suggest checking the differentiation of the antiderivative to verify correctness. Others discuss a substitution method involving u-substitution to simplify the integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. There is a suggestion to verify work through differentiation, and alternative methods are being explored without a clear consensus on the correct solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of integration techniques and are considering the implications of their chosen methods. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the original poster's calculations, prompting further investigation.

mike01
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Integration By Parts?

Homework Statement


int.arctan(2x)dx


Homework Equations


Integration By Parts


The Attempt at a Solution



In the attached image is the original problem with the ansewer I came up with using integration by parts and then a v=sub. later in the problem I did not want to post additional steps because it turned out to be a longer problem than I thought Just curious if someone could confirm my ansewer and if it is incorrect I will post the work to help see where I messed up. thanks a ton.
 

Attachments

  • 1a.JPG
    1a.JPG
    3 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org


I differentiated your antiderivative and I didn't get arctan(2x). If you want to check your work in the future, you could try that too. You can often get a clue where you messed up by looking at that as well.
 


thanks I will see if I can figure it out.
 


Yeah i almost got the same thing, except for the (1/4) looks like just a u-sub

Integral of arctan(2x) dx... u=2x du=2dx dx=(1/2)du

so now we have (1/2) integ arctan(u) du

leave the (1/2) out in front as a constant and I got u*arctan(u)-ln(sqrt(1+u^2))

plug everything back in and i got x*arctan(2x)-(1/2)ln(sqrt(1+4x^2)) ... but I just used a table for arctan(u)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K