Integration by parts with orthogonality relation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral \(\int_{0}^{a} x \sin\frac{\pi x}{a} \sin\frac{\pi x}{a} \, dx\), which is related to the orthogonality relation of sine functions. Participants are exploring methods to evaluate this integral, particularly through integration by parts and trigonometric identities.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt integration by parts, setting \(u = x\) and \(dv = \sin\frac{n\pi x}{a} \sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}\), but express confusion over the results obtained. Others suggest using trigonometric identities to simplify the integral.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the validity of their approaches and the application of the orthogonality relation. There is acknowledgment of the need for clarity regarding the use of definite versus indefinite integrals in the context of integration by parts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the integral's evaluation may be complicated by the requirement of definite limits and the implications of using the orthogonality relation. There is also mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the evaluation of integrals in the context of integration by parts.

FatPhysicsBoy
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to integrate [tex]\int_{0}^{a} xsin\frac{\pi x}{a}sin\frac{\pi x}{a}dx[/tex]

Homework Equations



I have the orthogonality relation:

[tex]\int_{0}^{a} sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}dx = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2} &\mbox{if } n = m; \\ <br /> 0 & \mbox{otherwise.} \end{cases}[/tex]

and the parts formula:
[tex]\int u \, dv=uv-\int v \, du[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I took [itex]u = x[/itex], and [itex]dv = sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}[/itex]. Following the parts formula I get a final answer of [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{2} - \frac{a^{2}}{2} = 0[/itex]. However, this is incorrect. The correct answer for the integral is [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{4}[/itex].

I know how to do this using a trigonometric identity to swap out the [itex]sin^{2}x[/itex] term for a linear term involving [itex]cos2x[/itex], but I don't quite understand why this method doesn't work. I think it has something to do with linearity but I don't fully understand why one method works and the other doesn't.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FatPhysicsBoy said:

Homework Statement



I want to integrate [tex]\int_{0}^{a} xsin\frac{\pi x}{a}sin\frac{\pi x}{a}dx[/tex]
This is the same as
$$ \int_{0}^{a} xsin^2(\frac{\pi x}{a})dx$$

An easier way to integrate this is to use a trig double angle formula.
FatPhysicsBoy said:

Homework Equations



I have the orthogonality relation:

[tex]\int_{0}^{a} sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}dx = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2} &\mbox{if } n = m; \\ <br /> 0 & \mbox{otherwise.} \end{cases}[/tex]

and the parts formula:
[tex]\int u \, dv=uv-\int v \, du[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I took [itex]u = x[/itex], and [itex]dv = sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}[/itex]. Following the parts formula I get a final answer of [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{2} - \frac{a^{2}}{2} = 0[/itex]. However, this is incorrect. The correct answer for the integral is [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{4}[/itex].

I know how to do this using a trigonometric identity to swap out the [itex]sin^{2}x[/itex] term for a linear term involving [itex]cos2x[/itex], but I don't quite understand why this method doesn't work. I think it has something to do with linearity but I don't fully understand why one method works and the other doesn't.
 
FatPhysicsBoy said:

Homework Statement



I want to integrate [tex]\int_{0}^{a} xsin\frac{\pi x}{a}sin\frac{\pi x}{a}dx[/tex]

Homework Equations



I have the orthogonality relation:

[tex]\int_{0}^{a} sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}dx = \left \{ \begin{matrix}<br /> \frac{a}{2} \text{, if \textit{n = m};}\\ <br /> 0 \text{, otherwise.}<br /> \end{matrix}\right.[/tex]

If you have a "\left", you need a matching "\right". "\right." is necessary if you don't want a closing symbol. But this sort of thing is best done using "\begin{cases}":
Code:
I(n,m)  = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2}, & \mbox{if $n = m$}, \\[1em]
0 & \mbox{else} \end{cases}
gives
[tex] I(n,m) = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2}, & \mbox{if $n = m$} \\[1em]<br /> 0 & \mbox{else} \end{cases}[/tex]

and the parts formula:
[tex]\int u \, dv=uv-\int v \, du[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I took [itex]u = x[/itex], and [itex]dv = sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}[/itex]. Following the parts formula I get a final answer of [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{2} - \frac{a^{2}}{2} = 0[/itex]. However, this is incorrect. The correct answer for the integral is [itex]\frac{a^{2}}{4}[/itex].

I know how to do this using a trigonometric identity to swap out the [itex]sin^{2}x[/itex] term for a linear term involving [itex]cos2x[/itex], but I don't quite understand why this method doesn't work. I think it has something to do with linearity but I don't fully understand why one method works and the other doesn't.

If [itex]dv = \sin(\pi x/a)\sin(\pi x/a)[/itex] then
[tex] v = \int \sin(\pi x/a)\sin(\pi x/a)\,dx.[/tex] The integral is indefinite, not a definite integral from [itex]0[/itex] to [itex]a[/itex], so you can't use the orthogonality relation to evaluate it.
 
pasmith said:
If you have a "\left", you need a matching "\right". "\right." is necessary if you don't want a closing symbol. But this sort of thing is best done using "\begin{cases}":
Code:
I(n,m)  = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2}, & \mbox{if $n = m$}, \\[1em]
0 & \mbox{else} \end{cases}
gives
[tex] I(n,m) = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2}, & \mbox{if $n = m$} \\[1em]<br /> 0 & \mbox{else} \end{cases}[/tex]



If [itex]dv = \sin(\pi x/a)\sin(\pi x/a)[/itex] then
[tex] v = \int \sin(\pi x/a)\sin(\pi x/a)\,dx.[/tex] The integral is indefinite, not a definite integral from [itex]0[/itex] to [itex]a[/itex], so you can't use the orthogonality relation to evaluate it.

Thanks for that, I managed to get it sorted in the end, I hit 'Submit Reply' by accident instead of 'Preview Post'.

I suppose that does make sense when I consider all the other instances where I've used product rule. We never evaluate the v integrand definitely. If the integral is always indefinite then why don't we have constants of integration floating about when we do integration by parts?
 
There isn't a need to use integration by parts. You can easily solve this by using the properties of definite integral.

Let:
$$I=\int_0^a x\sin^2\left( \frac{\pi x}{a}\right)\,dx$$
The above is same as:
$$I=\int_0^a (a-x)\sin^2\left( \frac{\pi x}{a}\right)\,dx$$
Add the two expressions for ##I## to get:
$$2I=\int_0^a a\sin^2\left( \frac{\pi x}{a}\right)\,dx$$
Use the orthogonality relation you posted to get the required answer.
 
FatPhysicsBoy said:
I suppose that does make sense when I consider all the other instances where I've used product rule. We never evaluate the v integrand definitely. If the integral is always indefinite then why don't we have constants of integration floating about when we do integration by parts?

We don't need them. If [itex]C[/itex] is a constant then [itex](v(x) +C)' = v'(x)[/itex] and
[tex] \int u(x)v'(x)\,dx = u(x)(v(x) + C) - \int u'(x)(v(x) + C)\,dx \\<br /> = u(x)v(x) + Cu(x) - \int u'(x)v(x)\,dx - \int Cu'(x)\,dx \\<br /> = u(x)v(x) - \int u'(x)v(x)\,dx + C\left( u(x) - \int u'(x)\,dx\right) \\<br /> = u(x)v(x) - \int u'(x)v(x)\,dx + C\left( u(x) - (u(x) + D)\right) \\<br /> = u(x)v(x) - \int u'(x)v(x)\,dx - CD[/tex] and we can combine [itex]-CD[/itex] with the constant we get from integrating [itex]u'v[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
FatPhysicsBoy said:

Homework Equations



I have the orthogonality relation:

[tex]\int_{0}^{a} sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}dx = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2} &\mbox{if } n = m; \\ <br /> 0 & \mbox{otherwise.} \end{cases}[/tex]

and the parts formula:
[tex]\int u \, dv=uv-\int v \, du[/tex]

You're answer is wrong because [tex]\int_{0}^{a} sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}sin\frac{m\pi x}{a}dx = \begin{cases} \frac{x}{2} &\mbox{if } n = m; \\ <br /> 0 & \mbox{otherwise.} \end{cases}[/tex]

The [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex] is after evaluation of the integral from 0 to a. So your [itex]\int[/itex]vdu is actually [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\frac{x}{2}[/itex]dx.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K