Integration of an inverse sqrt composite function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time it takes for a transverse wave to travel up a rope when a box is pushed from the bottom of a cave. The scenario includes parameters such as the mass of the box, the mass of the rope, and the gravitational acceleration, with a focus on deriving an expression for wave speed as a function of distance along the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formulation of the mass density of the rope and its implications for the wave speed equation. There are attempts to integrate the expression for travel time, with some participants questioning the integration steps and variable substitutions used.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing dialogue about the integration process and the correct interpretation of variables. Some participants have offered guidance on using substitution for integration, while others are still clarifying their understanding of the setup and the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the variable used for mass density needs to be constant rather than variable, which affects the integration approach. There is also mention of confusion regarding the integration of composite functions and the need for a clearer understanding of integration techniques.

Hendrick
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


“Geologist A” at the bottom of a cave signals to his colleague “Geologist B” at the surface by pushing a 11.0 kg box of samples from side to side. This causes a transverse wave to propagate up the 77.0 m rope. The total mass of the rope is 14.0 kg. Take g = 9.8 m/s².

How long does it take for the wave to travel from the bottom of the cave to the surface?[Hint: Find an analytic expression v(z) for the wave speed as a function of distance. Then use the fact that at any given point on the rope the time dt taken to travel a small distance dz is given by: dt=dz/v(z). Then integrate to obtain the total travel time. ]

http://oasis.phy.auckland.ac.nz/oasis/a/question/187416/image.gif

Homework Equations


u = mR/z
T(z) = u.z.g + mB.g
v(z) = (T(z)/u)^(1/2)
dt=dz/v(z)

z = the length of the rope = L (used for integrating)

The Attempt at a Solution


v(z) = (T(z)/u)^(1/2)
v(z) = ((mR/z).z.g + mB.g/(mR/z))^(1/2)
v(z) = ((mR.g + mB.g)/(mR/z))^(1/2)
v(z) = ([(mR.g)/(mR/z)] + [(mB.g)/(mR/z)])^(1/2)
v(z) = ([(mR.g.z)/mR] + [(mB.g.z)/mR])^(1/2)
v(z) = ([mR.g.z] + [(mB.g.z)/mR])^(1/2)

dt=dz/v(z)
dt=dz/([mR.g.z] + [(mB.g.z)/mR])^(1/2)

Integration:

...f L
t= | (1/([mR.g.z] + [(mB.g.z)/mR])^(1/2)).dz
...j 0

...f L
t= | 2.([mR.g.z^2/2] + [(mB.g.z^2)/mR.2])^(1/2).dz
...j 0

I think I integrated it properly but when substituted the values
mB = mass of box
mR = mass of rope
g = 9.8 ms^2
z = 77.0 m

I didn't get the correct answer of t = 2.52s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
'u' in your solution is supposed to be the mass density of the rope. It's not mR/z. The rope doesn't have a variable density, it's mR/(total length of rope), a constant. Nice problem presentation, by the way.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
'u' in your solution is supposed to be the mass density of the rope. It's not mR/z. The rope doesn't have a variable density, it's mR/(length of rope). Nice problem presentation, by the way.

Hi Dick, z is the length of the rope (77.0m as in the problem) it was just the letter they used in the formula sheet so I carried it forth.

How was my integration? I don't think I know how to integrate nested functions (I assume it's something like the reverse of the chain-rule?).
 
Hendrick said:
Hi Dick, z is the length of the rope (77.0m as in the problem) it was just the letter they used in the formula sheet so I carried it forth.

How was my integration? I don't think I know how to integrate nested functions (I assume it's something like the reverse of the chain-rule?).

z in your problem is the variable indicating length along the rope. I mean that u=14 kg/(77 m). It doesn't have the variable of integration in it. Until that gets fixed there isn't any point in discussing the integral.
 
In your notation u=mR/L not mR/z.
 
Dick said:
z in your problem is the variable indicating length along the rope. I mean that u=14 kg/(77 m). It doesn't have the variable of integration in it. Until that gets fixed there isn't any point in discussing the integral.

Oh, ok. Thanks for pointing that out :)

So:-

u = mR/L = mR/77
T(z) = u.z.g + mB.g
v(z) = (T(z)/u)^(1/2)
dt=dz/v(z)

z = the length of the rope = L (used for integrating)

The Attempt at a Solution


v(z) = (T(z)/u)^(1/2)
v(z) = ((u.z.g + mB.g)/u)^(1/2)
v(z) = ([(u.z.g)/u] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)
v(z) = ([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)

dt=dz/v(z)
dt=dz/([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)

Integration:

...f L
t= | (1/(([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)).dz
...j 0

...f L
t= | 2.([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2).(g.z^2)/2
...j 0

Where:
mB = mass of box
mR = mass of rope
g = 9.8 ms^2
z = 77.0 m

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Your first integral looks just fine. I don't know how you got from there to the second one. The usual way to do an integration like this is to do a change of variable. Let v=gz+mBg/u.
 
Dick said:
Your first integral looks just fine. I don't know how you got from there to the second one. The usual way to do an integration like this is to do a change of variable. Let v=gz+mBg/u.

Ok, I was trying to use the chain rule lol ><

So:-

Integration:

...f L
t= | (1/(([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)).dz
...j 0

...f L
t= | 2.([(g.z^2)/2] + [(mB.g.z)/u] + C)^(1/2)
...j 0

Where:
mB = mass of box
mR = mass of rope
g = 9.8 ms^2
z = 77.0 m

How am I doing? :smile:
 
Not too good. You're coming up with some pretty bizarre integration rules which aren't in the book. You have to do the change of variable thing. Eg to integrate 1/(a+bz)^(1/2) I would say v=(a+bz), so dv=b*dz. This turns the integral into 1/v^(1/2)*dv*(1/b). Now it's just integrating v^(-1/2). Does that sound familiar?
 
  • #10
Dick said:
Not too good. You're coming up with some pretty bizarre integration rules which aren't in the book. You have to do the change of variable thing. Eg to integrate 1/(a+bz)^(1/2) I would say v=(a+bz), so dv=b*dz. This turns the integral into 1/v^(1/2)*dv*(1/b). Now it's just integrating v^(-1/2). Does that sound familiar?

Unfortunately not very familiar at all. I haven't really dealt with composite integrals. But I'll try:

a = g.z
b = (mB.g)/u
1/(a+bz)^(1/2)

v=(a+bz), so dv=b*dz.
This turns the integral into 1/v^(1/2)*dv*(1/b).
Integrating v^(-1/2).So:-

Integration:

...f L
t= | (1/(([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)).dz
...j 0

...f L
t= | (1/(([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)).[(mB.g)/u]dz.(1/[(mB.g)/u])
...j 0

...f L
t= | 2.(([g.z] + [(mB.g)/u])^(1/2)).[(mB.g)/u].(1/[(mB.g)/u])
...j 0

Where:
mB = mass of box
mR = mass of rope
g = 9.8 ms^2
z = 77.0 m
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Take a break and clear your head. While your at it look back at integration by substitution in a calc text. I can roughly see what you are trying to do - but you still seem to be trying to do some kind of a chain rule. And the (1/b) factor in the example becomes (1/g) in the problem, right? Do you see where it's coming from? And after the integration is done and the dz is gone you should also drop the integral sign - it looks pretty confusing otherwise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K