Integration of Rational Functions by Partial Fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral of a rational function, specifically ∫(x^3 + 36)/(x^2 + 36) using techniques related to partial fractions and substitutions. The subject area is calculus, focusing on integration methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the division of the polynomial and the application of partial fractions. There is confusion regarding the inability to factor the denominator and how to approach the integration of the resulting fractions. Questions arise about the use of u-substitution and the relationship between the integrals of the fractions and inverse trigonometric functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various methods to tackle the integral, with some suggesting breaking the integral into simpler parts and considering substitutions. There is recognition of the need for further clarification on the integration techniques, particularly regarding the appearance of logarithmic functions in the solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the constraints of the problem, such as the requirement to use partial fractions despite the inability to factor the denominator. Participants also note the challenge of integrating certain forms and the implications of the problem's context within a homework setting.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate the integral. (Remember to use ln |u| where appropriate.)

∫(x^3 + 36)/(x^2 + 36)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



A little bit confused about arriving at the solution for this problem. I get stuck a little ways in. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

First I divided x^3+36 by the denominator, since the power of the numerator is greater. Doing so, I got x + (-36x+36)/(x^2+36). I rewrote my integral as ∫ x + (-36x+36)/(x^2+36).

Now, I want to be able to use some facet of partial fractions, the whole A + B...etc, but I don't really see how I can in this case. If I split up the second half of the integral, I can write it as -36x/x^2+36 + 36/x^2+6^2. Applying b^2-4ac < 0, I know that I won't be able to factor and that I could complete the square in these cases, but I don't really see how that helps me either.

I don't think the problem calls for u-substitution, as I've tried that, and since the problem is part of the partial fractions section, I'm thinking they want us to go about using that method.

I'm not looking for an exact answer, just a little confused about what method to use from here.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forestmine said:
Now, I want to be able to use some facet of partial fractions, the whole A + B...etc, but I don't really see how I can in this case.
You won't be able to, because x2 +36 can't be factored. Break it up as a sum of two fractions:
[itex]\int x dx + \int \frac{-36x}{x^2 + 36} dx + \int \frac{36}{x^2 + 36} dx[/itex]
(You might as well factor out a 36 from the 2 fractions before proceeding.)

You can use a u-substitution from the 1st fraction. The 2nd fraction... needs something else entirely. You familiar with the integrals that involve inverse trig?
 
I am familiar with inverse trig functions for integrals, and so for the second fraction, I see that if I can get it into the form 1/x^2+1, the integral is simply tan^-1.

So if I factor 36 from each fraction, I get

∫x/(x^2/36+1) + ∫1/(x^2/36 +1)

For the first fraction, u=x/6, du=1/6dx, so I now have ∫36u/(u^2+1) du. Similarly, for the second fraction I get, ∫1/(x^2/36+1). Setting u=x/6 for this fraction as well, and integrating, I get 6tan^-1(x/6).

Now for the first fraction...I'm stuck. I know the solution entails ln(x^2+36) which doesn't make any sense to me, because I thought that x^2+1 suggests we will use tan^-1, as we did in the second fraction.
 
The u on top in
$$36 \int \frac{u}{u^2+1}\,du$$ is the reason you get a log function. You're over-thinking it a bit. As eumyang said, you can do this one with a simple substitution.
 
So essentially the u in the numerator cancels with a u on the bottom? And that's why we get the log function?
 
If you're saying what I think you're saying, that is,
$$\frac{u}{u^2+1} \rightarrow \frac{1}{u+1},$$ then no. Algebra doesn't work that way.
 
Haha I know, that's why I'm completely confused as to how u/u^2+1 becomes the log function?
 
Nevermind, I figured it out. It takes another substitution, in this case u^2+1=z.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K