Integration or Riemann Sums: Which is More Effective for Numerical Integration?

Apost8
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Is there ever a situation where it is more appropriate/advantageous to use Riemann summation as opposed to evaluating an integral, or is Riemann summation merely taught in order to help the student to understand what's going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I always thought the Riemann sum was more fun to do!
 
I would say that Riemann sums are taught primarily for grasping the concept of integration. It becomes impractical/impossible for complex functions and I can't think of a time when it would be easier.
 
Riemann sums are not "merely" taught to "understand what is going on".
They are taught because the PROOFS of Riemann integration depend on them, and as it happens, it is proofs that constitute the soul of maths, not nifty calculation techniques.
 
Last edited:
Thats true.
 
Numerical integration techniques are based on Riemann sums.

Also, typically the way one sets up an integral in a particular application is typically based on the Riemann sum concept.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top