Intensity & Amplitude of Gaussian Beam

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 8K views
russel.arnold
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Can tell me the exact relationship between the intensity and the amplitude for a gaussian beam
?
I know that I is proportional to |A|2 .. but i want the value of this proportianality constant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
 
Bob S said:
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.

Antiphon said:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
Actually, dropping the c gives the energy density in J/m3.
I'm using SI units. I'm not aware of any official "engineering units", unless you also mean the SI system?
 
Redbelly98 said:
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
 
I had this image on hand, thought I would share it. This is a power cross section of a gaussian laser beam. Each color represents a power level. Other beam parameters are given to the left.

4941far.jpg
 
Redbelly98 said:
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
We consider a normalized bi-gaussian electromagnetic radiation beam traveling in the z direction.

The Poynting vector is P(x,y) = E(x,y) x H(x,y) watts/m2 at every point in space, where E(x,y) is in volts per meter, and H(x,y) is in amps per meter.

E(x,y)/H(x,y) = Z0 = 377 ohms in free space

So the power density is w(x,y) = E2(x,y)/(2·Z0) watts/m2

or E(x,y) = sqrt[2·Z0·w(x,y)] volts/m

where the bi-gaussian distribution is w(x,y) = [W0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)] watts/m2

where the total beam power is W0 = ∫w(x,y) dx dy watts

Bob S
 
Last edited: