Intensity from a multi slit grating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the intensity formula for a multi-slit grating with 2N+1 slits and demonstrating its limiting case for two slits. The intensity is expressed as I(Y) = (M^2 / 2R^2) * (sin^2[(2N+1)x/2] / sin^2[x/2]), where x is defined in terms of physical parameters. The challenge is to manipulate the formula to show that it simplifies to I(Y) = (2M^2 / D^2) * cos^2(πd sinθ / λ) in the two-slit limit. The transformation involves using trigonometric identities to express the sine function in terms of cosine. Ultimately, the derivation confirms that both formulas align under the specified conditions.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
The intensity from a multi slit grating with 2N+1 slites is given by:

I(Y)=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{sin^2 \left[(2N+1) \frac{x}{2}\right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{x}{2}\right]}

where x=\frac{2 \pi Y d}{D \lambda}

I am to show how to find the limiting case of just two slites and show that in this limit the formula is exactly the same as:

I(Y)=\frac{2M^2}{D^2} cos^2 \left(\frac {\pi d sin\theta}{\lambda}\right)

so what I did:

I(Y)=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{sin^2 \left[(2N+1) \frac{x}{2}\right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{x}{2}\right]}

=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{sin^2 \left[ \frac{2 \pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{\pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}


I could turn this into cos/cos but I don't know how to get it into cos(sin) any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is actually:I(Y)=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{sin^2 \left[(2N+1) \frac{x}{2}\right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{x}{2}\right]}=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{sin^2 \left[ \frac{2 \pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{\pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} \frac{cos^2 \left[ \frac{\pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}{sin^2 \left[\frac{\pi \lambda d}{D \lambda} \right]}=\frac{M^2}{2R^2} cos^2 \left(\frac {\pi d sin\theta}{\lambda}\right)=\frac{2M^2}{D^2} cos^2 \left(\frac {\pi d sin\theta}{\lambda}\right)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top