Interaction of radiation with matter

Catty
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. Problem statement

i am trying to calculate the momentum and energy of the products in the reaction

7Be4 + e -----> 7Li3 + neutrino

2. Relavant equations

p = mv
mass of 7Be = 7.016929 u
mass of 7Li = 7.016004 u 3. The attempt at a solution

i know that after the electron capture, the neutrino and the daughter nucleas will move in opposite directions with the same momentum magnitude, and so form momentum coservation

mv(Li) = mv(neutrino)

but how do i go about findig the 'v' of Lithium in order to calculate its momentum, mv. the question does not give any info on 'v'. ? Do i even need the value of 'v' or not. So that i can then put that 'v' into the equation of finding the energy of the daughter nucleas as:

1/2 * m(Li)*v^2(Li) = ( m(neutrino)/m(Li) ) * E(neutrino)

am i actually in the right path, i would greatly appreciate any directions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where do you use energy conservation? It is important here, together with momentum conservation.

the question does not give any info on 'v'.
It does not have to.

The neutrino is ultrarelativistic, you cannot use the nonrelativistic momentum. Treat it like photons instead. Do you know the energy-momentum relation for photons?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
* The momentum of the neutrino is not going to be mv because it will be a relativistic particle.

* Did you apply energy conservation?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ohhh, Thank you, it's E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m0*c^2)^2

will apply it , hadn't considered the relativistic issue...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top