Interactions of Moving Particles: Magnetic Fields and Experimental Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter crx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
crx
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have two muons (or electrons, protons or larger bodies, etc) moving in the same direction with the same speed. If stationary they will repulse each other. If in motion to a stationary observer they will create and interact by the magnetic field around them, pulling toward each other. What the observer will see if travel at the same speed, and direction with the particles ? Repulsion or attraction? What is the laboratory experiment result ?


Another one is, if a magnetic compass will show any magnetic field around a straight wire with a dc current in it, if the compass is moving along the wire, same direction with the speed of the electrons, (a few mm/sec) ?
I know that this is an old question but i just can't find a satisfying answer...thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric repulsion is always greater than the magnetic attraction for this case.
The electron drift velocity in a wire is very small. Moving a compass at that rate will have a negligible effect. The magnetic field of the wire is caused by the difference in motion of the electrons and the positive charge. This will not change by a slow motion of the compass.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top