Interatomic coulombic potential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypatio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of coulombic potentials, specifically examining the differences in equations and constants used in various resources. Participants explore the implications of different unit systems and the relationship between force and potential in the context of Coulomb's law.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the standard equation for force in Coulomb's law and questions the removal of the square of the distance in an alternative resource.
  • Another participant clarifies that the force is proportional to 1/r² while the potential is proportional to 1/r, suggesting a distinction between the two concepts.
  • A third participant explains that the alternative formula provided is for energy rather than force, indicating that the numerical constant is derived from using the numerical charge and distance in nanometers.
  • There is a query about the accuracy of the constant k_e given in the alternative resource, with a participant providing a commonly accepted value for k_e in N m²/C².
  • Participants discuss the definitions of partial charge and numerical charge, with one participant defining numerical charge as the charge in units of elementary charge and identifying e as the elementary charge value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy and interpretation of the constant k_e, as well as the relationship between force and potential. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the given value of k_e or the implications of using different units.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the differences in equations may stem from varying definitions and unit systems, which could affect the interpretation of the constants involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electrostatics, particularly those exploring the nuances of Coulomb's law and the implications of different unit systems in calculations.

Hypatio
Messages
147
Reaction score
1
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials. The equation given in wikipedia is

[tex]F=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}[/tex]

where k_e is in units of N m^2 C^-2, q are the partial charges, and r is the distance.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*10^19 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r^2 give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*10^19 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Hypatio! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Hypatio said:
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*1019 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r2give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

the force is ~ 1/r2

the potential is ~ 1/r :wink:
Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*1019 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?

i don't recognise that figure

the usual constant in Coulomb's law is 8.988 x 109 N m2/C2

(or 8.987 551 787 368 176 4, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law#The_law)
 
Hypatio said:
I am trying to calculate coulombic potentials. The equation given in wikipedia is

[tex]F=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^2}[/tex]

where k_e is in units of N m^2 C^-2, q are the partial charges, and r is the distance.

However, I look here and they give k_e=2.31*10^19 and remove the square of the distance. I assume that the difference is related to the units, which is in J*nm in this other resource, but if k_e is a constant then how can an equation of the form 1/r^2 give the same answer as one with the form 1/r?

Also, is the given value of k_e (2.31*10^19 J*nm) very accurate? What is the more accurate value?

The formula in the paper is for energy and not for force:
[tex]E=k_e\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r}[/tex]
The numerical constant comes from the units: they use the numerical charge (number of electron charges) and not the charge in coulombs.
They also use the distance in nm.
So the number you see is

[tex]k_e\times e^2\times 10^9[/tex]
 
Thanks!

What is the difference between the partial charge and the 'numerical charge'? Also, what is the parameter e?
 
Numerical charge is the charge in units of elementary (electron charge).
e is the value of the elementary charge (1.6x10^(-19) C).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
989
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K