Intercepts and Graphs: Understanding the Use of 'OR' in Sketching Y=(x-2)(x-3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter TyErd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on sketching the graph of y=(x-2)(x-3), the use of 'OR' in finding x-intercepts is clarified. The x-intercepts are determined by setting each factor to zero, resulting in x=2 or x=3. The rationale for using 'OR' is that only one factor needs to be zero for the product to equal zero, not both. This principle is illustrated with the example of ab=0, where either a or b can be zero, but not both simultaneously if they are distinct. Thus, the terminology reflects the mathematical reality of how intercepts are derived in quadratic equations.
TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Alright let's says for example we were to sketch y=(x-2)(x-3). You would find x intercepts and you would write it as x-2=0 OR x-3=0, thus x=2 OR x=3. Why do we use the word OR when we use both of the intercepts to sketch the graph anyway? Why cannot we use AND instead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


To find the x-intercepts, which is where y=0, when you have two variables multiplied together to equal zero, you only need one or the other to be 0.

e.g. if you have ab=0, where a and b are not equal, then a can be 0 or b can be 0, but since a is not equal to b then you can't have a and b are 0.

Same thing goes with that quadratic. (x-2)(x-3)=0 means that for some value x, the first factor (x-2) will equal zero while the second won't, and similarly for the second factor. This is why it is said x-2=0 OR x-3=0.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top