Interested in learning quantum but

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
To begin learning quantum mechanics, a solid foundation in calculus, differential equations, and introductory physics is essential. Starting with an "introductory modern physics" book, often used in sophomore courses, is recommended for historical context and motivation before diving into more rigorous texts. Griffiths' book is a popular choice for its clear explanations, although it may overlook some critical topics like Dirac notation. Pairing Griffiths with Gasiorowicz can provide a comprehensive understanding, as Gasiorowicz covers more material but with less clarity. For those at a junior math level, transitioning directly to Griffiths is feasible. However, it may be ambitious to cover both Griffiths and Gasiorowicz thoroughly in just two months before the school year starts.
torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Interested in learning quantum but...

I have only taken calculus, single and multi variable, differential equations and a first course in linear algebra. My physics back ground includes calc based intro mechanics( without waves and ocillations) and electricity and magnetism.

Am I set to start learning quantum mechanics on my own?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes! You might want to start by picking up an "introductory modern physics" book of the type that is often used for sophomore (second-year) level courses, right after the introductory mechanics / E&M courses. The QM isn't very rigorous in those books, but they do include background and historical material that is often skimmed over rapidly in "real" QM books, which will give you some motivation for the more rigorous mathematical treatment. Then you can move on to a book that has more details.

Don't expect to learn everything about QM in one go. There's much to be said for cycling through the material two or three times, with increasing depth and sophistication.
 
I like Griffiths. It is a great junior level book. It explains things well, but it kinda skims over dirac notation which is very important, along with some other important topics. My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471057002/?tag=pfamazon01-20Gasiorowicz covers more material, but does not explain things as well as Griffith's. Together, I think they are unbeatable.

jtbell was suggesting (I think) a sophomore level book along the lines of Serway's "Modern Physics":

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0534493394/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This is a level below Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. It does not cover Quantum mechanics in depth, but it provides an historical context and a good first introduction.
 
Last edited:
I suggest quantum physics by Eisberg and Resnick. It starts off with pre quantum material(planck radiation, photoelectric effect, Bohr atom etc) and explains the motivation behind the quantum theory. It is also very readable and easy on the begginner.
 
Well, I would say that I have a junior level standing in terms of math.( I've finished all of lower div math). So is it ok to just go into Griffith?

My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz

If so, is it doable to go through these books the summer(i.e 2 months) before school starts?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top