Interested in learning quantum but

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
To begin learning quantum mechanics, a solid foundation in calculus, differential equations, and introductory physics is essential. Starting with an "introductory modern physics" book, often used in sophomore courses, is recommended for historical context and motivation before diving into more rigorous texts. Griffiths' book is a popular choice for its clear explanations, although it may overlook some critical topics like Dirac notation. Pairing Griffiths with Gasiorowicz can provide a comprehensive understanding, as Gasiorowicz covers more material but with less clarity. For those at a junior math level, transitioning directly to Griffiths is feasible. However, it may be ambitious to cover both Griffiths and Gasiorowicz thoroughly in just two months before the school year starts.
torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Interested in learning quantum but...

I have only taken calculus, single and multi variable, differential equations and a first course in linear algebra. My physics back ground includes calc based intro mechanics( without waves and ocillations) and electricity and magnetism.

Am I set to start learning quantum mechanics on my own?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes! You might want to start by picking up an "introductory modern physics" book of the type that is often used for sophomore (second-year) level courses, right after the introductory mechanics / E&M courses. The QM isn't very rigorous in those books, but they do include background and historical material that is often skimmed over rapidly in "real" QM books, which will give you some motivation for the more rigorous mathematical treatment. Then you can move on to a book that has more details.

Don't expect to learn everything about QM in one go. There's much to be said for cycling through the material two or three times, with increasing depth and sophistication.
 
I like Griffiths. It is a great junior level book. It explains things well, but it kinda skims over dirac notation which is very important, along with some other important topics. My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471057002/?tag=pfamazon01-20Gasiorowicz covers more material, but does not explain things as well as Griffith's. Together, I think they are unbeatable.

jtbell was suggesting (I think) a sophomore level book along the lines of Serway's "Modern Physics":

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0534493394/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This is a level below Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. It does not cover Quantum mechanics in depth, but it provides an historical context and a good first introduction.
 
Last edited:
I suggest quantum physics by Eisberg and Resnick. It starts off with pre quantum material(planck radiation, photoelectric effect, Bohr atom etc) and explains the motivation behind the quantum theory. It is also very readable and easy on the begginner.
 
Well, I would say that I have a junior level standing in terms of math.( I've finished all of lower div math). So is it ok to just go into Griffith?

My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz

If so, is it doable to go through these books the summer(i.e 2 months) before school starts?
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top