Interesting Coincidence with Classical/Modern View of Mass and Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the relationship between mass and energy in both classical and modern physics, noting that energy can be expressed as a scalar multiple of mass, exemplified by the equation 1 J = 1 kg*(m/s)^2. It suggests that squaring the vector quantity of velocity results in a scalar, reinforcing the connection to mass-energy equivalence. The conversation points out that setting the speed of light to 1 aligns the units of mass and energy, indicating a deeper relationship in relativity. Additionally, it speculates on alternative forms of kinetic energy and their implications, concluding that the established mass-energy relationship is not merely coincidental. This exploration emphasizes the coherence of physical formulas across different frameworks.
Cadaei
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Has anyone ever noticed that, even in classical physics, energy is shown as a scalar multiple of mass?

For example, consider the joule;

1 J = 1 kg*(m/s)^2

If you consider the units of motion (m/s) to be a vector quantity, then squaring such a vector would be interpreted as a dot product that produces a scalar.

1 J (energy) = [mass in kg]*[scalar speed]

Which is eerily similar to E=MC^2. Thus, whether anyone in the past realized it or not, did they inadvertently stumble on the mass-energy equivalence just by dealing with these units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The units in a physical formula actually do work out? What a coincidence!
 
Creepy! :bugeye:
 
If you set the speed of light to 1, mass and energy have the same units. This is not a coincidence, and shows that the concepts are related in relativity.

If, for some strange reason, nonrelativistic kinetic energy would be something like mv^3, the rest energy of objects should be something like mc^3. But I do not think this would give meaningful physics.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top