Interesting exercise of probability

Alexsandro
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
A snake with a little more than 4 meters takes a walk for the forest in the following way. After to walk 1 meter in definitive direction it decides aleatoriamente if she capsizes for the left or if she capsizes for the right or if she continues in the same direction, independently of the previous decisions. However, if at some moment it finds its proper tail, it does not recognize it, bites and dies poisoned. She determines the probability of that the snake walks at least 10 meters before dying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider encoding the above movements this way,
1. whenever the snake moves right, mark it as -1
2. whenever the snake moves straight, mark it as 0
3. whenever the snake moves left, mark it as 1

Thus the movements of snake can be encoded as a stream of -1's,0's and 1's.
This sequence terminates whenever we see 4 consecutive 1's or -1's.
The required probability then becomes,
P(length of sequence >=10)
= 1 - P(length of sequence<10)
I think this should be computable, albeit tedious (which is why i am avoiding doing it right now anyways).

-- AI
 
-- and all mirror reflections state 1 whre the last 2 metres can be oriented in any way
_| " state 2 where the last 2 metres should not be oriented parallel to the first one

=| state 3

We can formulate the following:

p1(n+1)=1/3.p1(n)+1/3.p2(n)+1/3.p3(n)
p2(n+1)=2/3.p1(n)+1/3.p2(n)+1/3.p3(n)
p3(n+1)=0.p1(n)+1/3.p2(n)+0.p3(n)

which is of the form
P(n+1)=T.P(n)
So we have
P(9)=T^9.P(0)..as we need 9 movs to be alive so that it definitely moves 1 more metre
where P(0)=[1,0,0]'

SO we get

P(9)=[0.2317 0.3136 0.1108]

or pr(living)=0.6560
 
Last edited:
To be more precise it is
12913/19683
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
58
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
116
Views
17K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top