Interesting math theorem in measure theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Riesz Representation Theorem in measure theory, which states that every linear functional can be represented by integrating with respect to a measure. The conditions outlined for the functional I(f, d) include linearity, additivity over disjoint regions, and scalar multiplication. The original poster sought references for this theorem in graduate-level measure theory texts but found none in Spivak's "Calculus on Manifolds." The conversation highlights the necessity of normalization in defining such functionals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functionals in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with measure theory concepts
  • Knowledge of integration and its properties
  • Basic principles of Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Riesz Representation Theorem in detail
  • Explore linear functionals and their properties in functional analysis
  • Learn about Hilbert spaces and their applications in mathematics
  • Investigate normalization processes in measure theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in mathematics, and anyone interested in advanced topics in measure theory and functional analysis.

jbusc
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is kind of vague, but the other day, one of my math profs told me about a theorem which he thought was particularly interesting. I might be missing or getting a condition wrong, but here goes:

Suppose [tex]I(f, d)[/tex] is a real-valued function, where f is a real-valued function always defined on a region d, and that region d. if:

1. [tex]I(f_1 + f_2, d) = I(f_1, d) + I(f_2, d)[/tex]
2. If [tex]d = d_1 \cup d_2[/tex], and [tex]d_1 \cap d_2 = \emptyset[/tex], then [tex]I(f, d) = I(f, d_1) + I(f, d_2)[/tex]
3. If [itex]a[/itex] is a real constant, then [tex]I(af, d) = aI(f, d)[/tex]

Then, [tex]I(f, d) = \int_d f[/tex]

I asked about where I could find this in a book or online and he said a graduate-level book on measure theory (which unfortunately I don't have any). I did look through Spivak's calculus on manifolds, but nothing came close even.

Does anyone recognize this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As stated it cannot be true: the functional I(f,d) = k*int_d d for instance satisfies the same criterion as above, as do many others: you need some kind of normalization process.

What is true is that you're looking at the Riesz Representation theorem. Note I am very unsure of the spelling: it could be Riezche, Rietzche, or who knows what. It says that every linear functional (yes, that is the key word) is given by integrating with respect to something.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riesz_representation_theorem

There are two related eaiser to understand ideas. The latter is the riesz theorem for hilbert spaces.

1. Given the space of polynomials on one variable, R[x], define an operator D on R[x] that is linear, sends x to 1, and some other things and you can prove that D must be differentiation. Can't recall the exact statement.

2. If H is a hilbert space (possibly with some conditions), and if f is a linaer functional then there is a y such that f(x) =<x,y> for all x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K