Interface (Maxwell-Wagner) Polarization and Dielectric Loss

citw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Maxwell-Wagner polarization is generally described in literature as the polarization of interfaces, such as grain boundaries, with an applied electric field. In the Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars_polarization), it's mentioned that "the charges are often separated over a considerable distance and the contribution to dielectric loss can therefore be orders of magnitude larger...".

I'm still trying to understand the origin of dielectric loss, so can someone please explain why "larger" charge separation leads to more substantial loss?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Wikipedia ... Did you check the articles cited?
 
DrDu said:
Well, Wikipedia ... Did you check the articles cited?

Unfortunately, the specific citation for this point is a textbook that I do not have access to.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top