Intermediate E&M. Just need a check. Should be easy

  • Thread starter Thread starter maherelharake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the total charge within a rectangular box defined by specific diagonal corners and a given charge distribution. The subject area is electromagnetism, specifically focusing on charge distributions and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the bounds of integration, with one questioning the order of the x-bounds. There is mention of confusion regarding the integration process and the conversion of units from centimeters to meters.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants reflecting on their previous attempts and clarifying their understanding of the integration bounds. Some express confidence in their revised approaches, while others acknowledge potential errors in unit conversion.

Contextual Notes

There is a time constraint mentioned, as the problem is due the following morning. Participants are navigating the complexities of unit conversions and integration limits as part of their discussion.

maherelharake
Messages
261
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a rectangular box with diagonal corners at (0,0,0) and (-1,2,3)cm. We place charge inside this box with distribution, ρ(r)=2x-3(z-1) with units of nC/m3. What is the total charge inside this box?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have attached what I did. I asked this yesterday, and someone told me my answer was correct (at the time I had 3E-15 C). However, I think I did something wrong, and redid my problem. Please let me know which way is correct, if either.
 

Attachments

  • Triple.jpg
    Triple.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
Your x-bounds are strange. Why did you reverse them?
 
The teacher told me to do this. I was confused on it as well, but he assured me it is supposed to be in that order.
 
I am going to sleep soon. If you can please help me (it's due tomorrow morning) I will look at your response when I wake up.
 
Oh nvm, the integration is right now that I take a second look at it. I got confused by the x going on bottom, but since it is negative that is all good. It looks like what you did is just fine. I don't know what the other way you did was, but this should be right (though I didn't actually do the numbers).
 
The other way was that I kept the bounds in terms of m and converted to cm at the end. However I think my numbers got messed up in the conversion. I think this way has less chance for error.
 
Yeah, hah, that's precisely why I didn't do the numbers was because you really ought to convert cm to m for the integrand limits to make sure you get it right. Not converting and having cm*m floating around can get tricky.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K