Studying Intermediate Physics Books: Mechanics, Electrodynamics for College

  • Thread starter Thread starter mewmew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
For intermediate to higher-level college physics books in Mechanics and Electrodynamics, several recommendations stand out. For classical mechanics, "Goldstein" and "Arnold" (or "Marsden") are considered advanced texts, while "Landau & Lifschitz" serves as a bridge between introductory and advanced levels. In Electrodynamics, "Griffiths" is highly recommended, with "J.D. Jackson" noted as a more challenging option. "Marion and Thornton" is suitable for undergraduate mechanics, and "Wangsness" aligns with a similar level for Electromagnetism. A solid understanding of differential and integral calculus, as well as ordinary differential equations, is essential for tackling these texts effectively.
mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
What are good intermediate/higher level college physics books are out there for Mechanics and electrodynamics? I am a physics major in an introductory calculus based honors physics class right now(we are using the Serway and jewett text) and want to get a jump start on physics for next year. I intend to do a LOT of reading this summer and need a nice supply of books. Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't really understand how advanced the level of those books must be.On classical mechanics,it can't get "worse" than Goldstein and Arnold (or Marsden).In between to an introductory text is Landau & Lifschitz.
As for CED,maybe u'd like to take a look into Griffiths' book.The "worst" is J.D.Jackson's.


Daniel.
 
Marion and Thornton is a undergraduate level mechanics text. Wangsness is about the same level for E&M. If you have worked thru Serway, you have enough background for them if your math skills are up to dat, i.e. Differential and Integral Calculus and ordinary Differential Equations.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top